User Requested removal
User Requested removal
So, he's implying that they should nominate people not by their merit, but based on ethnic/cultural diversity?
Or the did I read it wrong?
Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won
Will Smith and his whole family can leave Hollywood for all I care. They all nuts lol
Bandorr said:
I wonder the same thing. I can't tell if it is being implied that the "committee" is racist, or if they should be picking people based on things OTHER than their acting skill. I assumed the first thing, but seeing as how the committee has over 6000 members it seems hard to call them ALL racist. |
I'm seriously considering it's a mix of both.
Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won
The oscars will never be the same now. Award shows need to be as unbiased as possible now with the threat of racism this will change because they will feel like a black person needs to be up regardless if they deserved it or not.
Have the boycotters ever said who should have been nominated, and who should therefore have been omitted?
| LipeJJ said: So, he's implying that they should nominate people not by their merit, but based on ethnic/cultural diversity? Or the did I read it wrong? |
i'd have to review the movies out this year but that's kind of the question i want to know too.
the nominated people is filtered down to which movies/performers where great this year. now let's be honest,.. without much review i can already tell you most of the hollywood movies feature white people. so if there were no great performances from non-white people this year it seems like you shouldn't be protesting the awards ceremony but rather the movie casting.
but then casting often times comes down to celebrities that pack the theaters with people. a pure ecomonics based decision which implies it is movie goers that are truely to blame.
i dunno. there is a "problem" but i'm just not sure blame is being put in the right spot.
| noname2200 said: Have the boycotters ever said who should have been nominated, and who should therefore have been omitted? |
Idris Elba in.
JLaw out.
Cause reasons...
kitler53 said:
i'd have to review the movies out this year but that's kind of the question i want to know too. the nominated people is filtered down to which movies/performers where great this year. now let's be honest,.. without much review i can already tell you most of the hollywood movies feature white people. so if there were no great performances from non-white people this year it seems like you shouldn't be protesting the awards ceremony but rather the movie casting. but then casting often times comes down to celebrities that pack the theaters with people. a pure ecomonics based decision which implies it is movie goers that are truely to blame. i dunno. there is a "problem" but i'm just not sure blame is being put in the right spot. |
okay. to answer my own question here are the top 10 rated movies according to rotten tomatoes:
| . | 97% | Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) |
| 2. | 98% | Inside Out (2015) |
| 3. | 99% | Selma (2015) |
| 4. | 93% | Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015) |
| 5. | 98% | Brooklyn (2015) |
| 6. | 97% | It Follows (2015) |
| 7. | 97% | Spotlight (2015) |
| 8. | 99% | Shaun the Sheep (2015) |
| 9. | 93% | The Martian (2015) |
| 10. | 98% | Paddington (2015) |
so basically the possibility of non-white actors is:
1. selma
2. the black guy from star wars
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
