They had 11m in cash alone years ago, iirc.

Nothing wrong with wanting them to win, but u don't see how being profitable is far more important than being the winner?

What the hell do you mean 'the stock recovered.' It was at 24 now it's at 17. You are the one who I had all the problems with! They will 're-enter at the same position?' You're STILL arguing it, mate! Thank you for coming here and making it clear I wasn't being delusional.

Lol you're back.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212617&page=1#

As you can see recovering so only one here who's delusional is yourself mate, you owned yourself hard as 17 is a recovery from when you created this thread, it was below 15 before that then 16 when the linked thread was created now you say 17 so yes it recovered congratulations on not only owning yourself once but coming back to do it twice, you shot yourself in the foot here hard.

And it's dropped from there. Now it's back at 16. It was at 24 when it dropped upon the investor's meeting. It has not 'recovered.' 

I suppose recover means what he want for it to means. Nothing to see here.

Wyrdness argued that it would recover to what it was before its giant  drop, and then go on to be even higher. It has gone from 16 to 17 to 16.50 from 15, I wouldn't call that a recovery. I was arguing that it is now substantially lower than what it was when he argued it would now recover, months ago. It's just gotten worse, and the fact that it's gotten a little better from being worse than it was when it dropped doesn't mean it has 'recovered.' It hasn't returned to what it was after it had its big 'mobile delay' drop, let alone to what it was BEFORE, which is what he was arguing.

How is this hard to understand? Nintendo announces mobile delay/Miitomo - stock drops 10%. Wyrdness argues it will gain it all back and then some, just wait and see. Months later, the stock goes down even more than it did in that one day drop. Then, it gains a little bit and drops back. He crows victory. It is still below what it was AFTER the drop, let alone before the drop. Yet STILL, people are confused. What. The. Frig.

I agree with you don't understand why people have such a hard time to understand.

You're lying through your teeth I'll even link the thread if you want to go down that route to further dismatle your pride, what was said to you is that the stock would recover from any drop as that's the nature of stocks they're based on speculated money coming in so it was inflated above what it was actually worth so investors sold to gain a profit before the market corrected itself, the act of selling causes further drops, you were told the would be a recovery from this drop not what level it would go to. Right you're bsing because you've been owned twice by yourself and by everyone you argued with before so you're changing the argument to save face as a recovery has happened and you've been defeated by everyone you argued with.

Your posts are speaking for themself as they show a salty person who hasn't got a clue and trying to save his ego.