By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gaming Issues and Aggressive Indifference

zero129 said:

You assume far too many things about me. I understand how all that works. What i fail to see is how a game that has sold over 8 million units acros a number of platforms, couldnt of made enough money for a sequal, but yet games that look like they would of costed alot more and yet sell alot less are seen by their companys as being very successful and perfect for a sequal.. Too me it seems more likebad managment,  since im sure the is lots of other companys who would be very happy if their beat em up sold so well...

You're right, I was assuming.

Other companies might not be as diverse as Capcom, and thus not relying on the revenue from their heavy hitters to supplement their less successful endeavors.





Around the Network

Breaking news: people mostly jump onto forums and speak passionately online if something directly affects them in a negative manner (or in a supremely positive manner). For video games, this includes people who may not care for a particular genre of game (in this case, fighting games) but do not like the company involved (in this case, Sony) and do not want to see them get another feather in their proverbial cap. Comes down to "I don't want to buy another system to play a game I love! This is BS and I'm scared it will kill the franchise!" intermingled with "Doesn't this piss you off? Aren't these companies just so fucking evil? Click here for an online petition to show our numbers and spite that accursed religion...er, platform."



Intrinsic said:
You want a gaming forum without that kinda behavior? then make it
- referral only admission
- International passport verification
- and the use of real names.

Basically, take out anonymity. You'll be shocked how understanding everyone will be.

Ugh. I know right? It's all about anonymity. That's why the internet can bring the worst out in people.



Zkuq said:
An excellent post about a real issue. I couldn't agree more.

D'aw. Thanks, I needed that today : )





vivster said:
I know you want to be clever but in what world is any of what those people are doing indifference?

Well that's actually kind of the point isn't it? The sentiment they try to put forward is "I don't care/nobody cares/nobody should care!" but their passion in how they put that forward gives them away.





Around the Network
Lawlight said:
How is buying exclusivity a bad practice? It makes business sense. And truly, it's not worth caring about.

How topical.





JRPGfan said:

If not haveing street fighter bugs you that much,... buy a PS4?

Im not debateing right or wrong, above im Just saying things as they are

(thought honestly I believe Street fighter is very differnt situation than Rise of the Tomb Raider)

 

Its only going to get worse as the gen goes on. PS4 has so many games you ll never see on the Xbox One.

This is another topic entirely, but that's another response that bugs me. "Just buy a ps4/Xbone. What? You can't aford $400 for a new console"? Because for all people who make that argument know, no I can't afford that. And indeed no I can't.

I actually have hope that these situations will get less common as the generation goes on. As games get more expensive to make refraining from releasing one's game on as many platforms as is viable is an increasingly unwise move. I think we're just seeing exclusivity wars flare up again because it's the start of a new generation and Sony and Microsoft are trying hard to solidify their market shares. Once the install bases have been firmly established (a few years in, hopefully) then I think they'll stop throwing money around to snap up titles. I hope that's what will happen anyway.





Jazz2K said:
vivster said:
I know you want to be clever but in what world is any of what those people are doing indifference?

I think he means that people aren't concerned about bad practices when it doesn't "affect" them.

 



 


That's just human nature and not exclusive to internet forums or the internet. 



spemanig said:
Nope. I don't own a PS4 and I'm glad that Sony was smart enough to work out that exclusive. Same with Tomb Raider on XBO, which I also don't own. Those were great gets from both. Exclusives are what make consoles unique. If you want the game, buy the system. If you can't, sucks for you. Get over it.

You're kind of proving my point. The fact is I don't need either of the consoles because games are coming to PC, which I own. It's not myself I'm dissapointed for, but others who have to shell out not insubstantial cash if they want to play those games, and I don't think that's a situation they should be put in.

You may think that's a silly thing to concern myself with, luckily I don't ask that you give a crap about like I do.





PerturbedKitty said:
the best way to support your console is to make games for it. lol. its a dying art, i know.

That's why I don't stand against console manufacturers making games of their own. Sony makes Killzone, they can publish it on whatever systems they want.

But when it comes to just buying up titles, it's another matter. Such as in the case of Tomb Raider. It was already coming to Xbox, all microsoft did was pay off Squeenix to not let anybody else have it for a while. We english majors refer to that as a "dick move".