Fake, first of all Ubisoft got there dev kit way earlier then Oct 2015, second why would Ubisoft think anyone would want a late port of Liberation? Might as well make Liberation 2 with a port of the first with it.
But yeah fake.
Is it real? | |||
Yes | 84 | 27.18% | |
No | 111 | 35.92% | |
John Cena in Smash is realer! | 114 | 36.89% | |
Total: | 309 |
Fake, first of all Ubisoft got there dev kit way earlier then Oct 2015, second why would Ubisoft think anyone would want a late port of Liberation? Might as well make Liberation 2 with a port of the first with it.
But yeah fake.
Raze said: LOL Bucharest. Sure, I'm sure the Konami Dev in Endor can prove this too. People just making up names of places these days. FTL! Spoiler alert: Had to do it, I know Bucharest is a real place. ;) Personally I'm amazed Nintendo is even letting Ubi develop for them, after Ubi pretty much bailing on the Wii U. |
Let's just say this is real (which I highly doubt it is), Wii U had a lot of great games from Ubisoft at its release. Assassin's Creed Black Flag, Zombie U, and the definitive version of Rayman Legends. Ubisoft could hardly help the fact that no one was buying. This is one of the 3rd parties I have absolutely no problem with. It's the freaking bullcrap EA done (Mass Effect 3 and not 1 and 2), Warner Bros (and the half assed Batman Arkham Origins with no online or last story mode dlc), and all those other companies who half assed ports of their games that ran at worse framerates, looked worse than, and didn't add all the content that pissed me off.
I can only hope and dream that Ubisoft gives half the fuck they gave Wii U early in its life to the NX. It's up to Nintendo to make sure the games sell.
bigtakilla said:
Let's just say this is real (which I highly doubt it is), Wii U had a lot of great games from Ubisoft at its release. Assassin's Creed Black Flag, Zombie U, and the definitive version of Rayman Legends. Ubisoft could hardly help the fact that no one was buying. This is one of the 3rd parties I have absolutely no problem with. It's the freaking bullcrap EA done (Mass Effect 3 and not 1 and 2), Warner Bros (and the half assed Batman Arkham Origins with no online or last story mode dlc), and all those other companies who half assed ports of their games that ran at worse framerates, looked worse than, and didn't add all the content that pissed me off. I can only hope and dream that Ubisoft gives half the fuck they gave Wii U early in its life to the NX. It's up to Nintendo to make sure the games sell. |
How can Nintendo make their userbase buy Ubi games? They could help advertise those games and even help porting some titles, but making the userbase suddenly interested is a whole different thing.
Darwinianevolution said:
How can Nintendo make their userbase to buy Ubi games? They could help advertise those games and even help porting some titles, but making the userbase suddenly interested is a whole different thing. |
Well, while I agree that it isn't solely Nintendo's responsibility to sell Ubisoft games, I do believe wholeheartedly that it is 100% Nintendo's responsibility to get NX in as many peoples homes as possible. Having a good launch lineup or an amazing 6+ month lineup is crucial.
Next is Nintendo's need to advertise. This is a perfect example. http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/10/20/sony-unveils-new-live-action-ps4-advert
Now with the games shown in that commercial being from different dev companies and only the PS4 name being shown, I think it's safe to assume at least most of the money for that commercial is coming out of Playstation's pocket. But it shows a bunch of big budget games while ONLY referencing PS4 and not XBone. When these commercials air (which Playstation airs the most of any of the 3 companies) it builds hype.
Meanwhile Nintendo never advertises their 3rd party games and the 1st party game advertisements tend to look like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2JRs5pTSOU
Yeah, Nintendo needs to fix that and quick.
Third, Nintendo needs to make it dirt simple to port the games over, and it'd also benifit them to have the best versions of third party games. If they can get a console out at $300, beat the PS4 in terms of graphics and performance, have a strong launch line up, and advertise in a way that appeals to.... Well anyone at this point would be nice I could say that then the responsibility would solely be on Ubisoft.
All Ubisoft is really responsible at this point is to actually put effort in their games, don't remove content from the Wii U version, and have all the dlc available (which they did early for Wii U).
So its a hybrid console
REQUIESCAT IN PACE
I Hate REMASTERS
I Hate PLAYSTATION PLUS
I don't think this rumor is accurate
NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
- Official VGChartz Tutorial Thread -
NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
Here lies the hidden threads.
| |
Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread
| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]
Ultrashroomz said: I already don't buy it, cause of 4chan and Ubisoft. |
this
Darwinianevolution said:
How can Nintendo make their userbase buy Ubi games? They could help advertise those games and even help porting some titles, but making the userbase suddenly interested is a whole different thing. |
That's part of the job of Nintendo. Sometimes, third parties don't develop for Nintendo consoles because the userbase is not there.
For example, and this is just an imaginary example, to sell RPGs you need to entice the userbase to buy RPGs. Other companies make agreements with third parties, so there are a lot of RPGs to play, but if you have a sparse release, is Nintendo's job to keep busy the userbase between releases.
On other words, or Nintendo get a lot of third party support, or they have the job of the third party support + first party.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile
This is another reason why gaming journalists are trash and no one in the real world takes them seriously. It's a bunch of rumor based guesses and usually 98 % of them are wrong
Darwinianevolution said:
How can Nintendo make their userbase buy Ubi games? They could help advertise those games and even help porting some titles, but making the userbase suddenly interested is a whole different thing. |
They could do it the same way they got us ot buy splatoon, Like MS and Sony does to third party games. Advertise them and have there console in the end. For an example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4HioNAHDCg a mix of exclusive games and third parties.
DolPhanTendo said: This is another reason why gaming journalists are trash and no one in the real world takes them seriously. It's a bunch of rumor based guesses and usually 98 % of them are wrong |
This is 4chan not gaming journalism.
OP i actually can see this happening but still will keep an open mind for Nintendo announcements.