By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - How much do you expect Starfox Zero to sell?

 

?

500k or less 58 16.29%
 
500k - 1m 142 39.89%
 
1m - 1.5m 104 29.21%
 
Over 1.5m 52 14.61%
 
Total:356
curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So basically, you are in denial.

No, just thinking very realistically, that Nintendo will not release game in 2016. that have length of 2-3 hours, and it not first time that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood.

I admire your optimism, I really do, but in this instance you're rejecting a direct quote from the game's producer that doesn't really leave much room for interpretation. I don't mean to be unpleasant, but when you flat out refuse to accept such a clear cut statement, I really do not know what else to call it.





Around the Network
Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So basically, you are in denial.

No, just thinking very realistically, that Nintendo will not release game in 2016. that have length of 2-3 hours, and it not first time that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood.

I admire your optimism, I really do, but in this instance you're rejecting a direct quote from the game's producer that doesn't really leave much room for interpretation. I don't mean to be unpleasant, but when you flat out refuse to accept such a clear cut statement, I really do not know what else to call it.

Its not about optimism at all, I think it racional thiking, if I am optisam I would say game will have length of 9-12 hours, but I saying 4-6 hours. Expecting 2-3 hour length game is very pessimistic and totally illogical.

If you a really are interesting about what length of game people think they will see for Star Fox Zero, you make poll.



curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So basically, you are in denial.

No, just thinking very realistically, that Nintendo will not release game in 2016. that have length of 2-3 hours, and it not first time that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood.

I admire your optimism, I really do, but in this instance you're rejecting a direct quote from the game's producer that doesn't really leave much room for interpretation. I don't mean to be unpleasant, but when you flat out refuse to accept such a clear cut statement, I really do not know what else to call it.

Its not about optimism at all, I think it racional thiking, if I am optisam I would say game will have length of 9-12 hours, but I saying 4-6 hours. Expecting 2-3 hour length game is very pessimistic and totally illogical.

There is nothing illogical about going by the word of the game's producer.





Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So basically, you are in denial.

No, just thinking very realistically, that Nintendo will not release game in 2016. that have length of 2-3 hours, and it not first time that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood.

I admire your optimism, I really do, but in this instance you're rejecting a direct quote from the game's producer that doesn't really leave much room for interpretation. I don't mean to be unpleasant, but when you flat out refuse to accept such a clear cut statement, I really do not know what else to call it.

Its not about optimism at all, I think it racional thiking, if I am optisam I would say game will have length of 9-12 hours, but I saying 4-6 hours. Expecting 2-3 hour length game is very pessimistic and totally illogical.

There is nothing illogical about going by the word of the game's producer.

Yes it is if statement doesn't make sense (game with 2-3 hour length) and fact that that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood before.



curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

There is nothing illogical about going by the word of the game's producer.

Yes it is if statement doesn't make sense (game with 2-3 hour length) and fact that that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood before.

It makes perfect sense; the series has traditionally had 2-3 hours of content.

Starfox 64 3D just a few years back still had 2-3 hours of content. 



Around the Network
Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

There is nothing illogical about going by the word of the game's producer.

Yes it is if statement doesn't make sense (game with 2-3 hour length) and fact that that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood before.

It makes perfect sense; the series has traditionally had 2-3 hours of content.

Starfox 64 3D just a few years back still had 2-3 hours of content. 

Star Fox 64 is game from 97", Star Fox 64 3D is same game with 3D.

It not make any sense to make new game that have 2-3 hours of content in 2016.



curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

It makes perfect sense; the series has traditionally had 2-3 hours of content.

Starfox 64 3D just a few years back still had 2-3 hours of content. 

Star Fox 64 is game from 97", Star Fox 64 3D is same game with 3D.

It not make any sense to make new game that have 2-3 hours of content in 2016.

Nintendo do things that "don't make sense" all the time.





Miyamotoo on 15 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Star Fox 64 is game from 97", Star Fox 64 3D is same game with 3D.

It not make any sense to make new game that have 2-3 hours of content in 2016.

Nintendo do things that "don't make sense" all the time.

Actually I find lots sense in things that they are doing but that isn't sense of other companies, I think I understand how they thinking and what I can expect from them.

For instance I don't expect things like not releasing Zelda U for Wii U at all or that Star Fox Zero will only have 2-3 hours of content, but definatly expecting that NX will get Zelda U port and that NX will be relase in 2016.



curl-6 on 15 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Nintendo do things that "don't make sense" all the time.

Actually I find lots sense in things that they are doing but that isn't sense of other companies, I think I understand how they thinking and what I can expect from them.

For instance I don't expect things like not releasing Zelda U for Wii U at all or that Star Fox Zero will only have 2-3 hours of content, but definatly expecting that NX will get Zelda U port and that NX will be relase in 2016.

Starfox Zero is the third version and second reimagining of the traditional Starefox template; Fox fighting to take back the Lylat system from Andross. It is not a sequel like Adventure, Command, or Assault, it is a remake. Ergo, it would make sense for it to retain the structure of the games it is reimagining; games designed to be beaten in a single playthrough, but replayed for branching paths and high score attempts.



Miyamotoo on 15 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Nintendo do things that "don't make sense" all the time.

Actually I find lots sense in things that they are doing but that isn't sense of other companies, I think I understand how they thinking and what I can expect from them.

For instance I don't expect things like not releasing Zelda U for Wii U at all or that Star Fox Zero will only have 2-3 hours of content, but definatly expecting that NX will get Zelda U port and that NX will be relase in 2016.

Starfox Zero is the third version and second reimagining of the traditional Starefox template; Fox fighting to take back the Lylat system from Andross. It is not a sequel like Adventure, Command, or Assault, it is a remake. Ergo, it would make sense for it to retain the structure of the games it is reimagining; games designed to be beaten in a single playthrough, but replayed for branching paths and high score attempts.

Fact that is a remake doesn't mean we cannot see any additional content, we already saw different and new vehicles, we already saw some new levels too. 

So no, I dont seeing only 2-3 hours of content.