I'm pretty sure a new SC is in development. They even made a poll to determine wich characters people want. I think this time they wont make the mistakes they did with SCV.

For me, its amazing how often developers forget that the roster is super important in a fighting game. People get attached to the characters, you can't just ditch half of it and expect the next game to be loved. Especially if the replacements aren't on the same level.

I feel like MKX is making the same mistake, trolling its costumers, having a roster half made up of cliche characters and guest characters while ignoring fan favorites. I even deleted the game before they announced the new kombat pack, and now that its announced i feel like my decision was the correct one. I mean... who the heck asked for Jason and leatherface? Bo'rai'cho? When theres so many cool and loved characters that got shafted. Its lame. 

Look up "Xbox One, Latin America sales lead". I think DualShockers had the article...

Not way better, but they do have a higher attach rate. The thing is, you are using EA as a source and EA is ONE developer. The other source you have, the chart, portrays sales during the month of January. Xbox sales scale down rapidly shortly after the holidays, so that is not indicative of the attach rate. It's circumstantial. You'd need a similar chart for holidays to be able to come up with a number. You can say that as a rule of thumb, PS digital revenue is higher, but not the attach rate, because those are only significant for two months for which we have no numbers unless you go by the claim that Halo 5 digital sales were higher than usual.

Every character should be in, especially Pyrrha... otherwise, there'll be hell to pay...

Oh boy we have a discussion on sources or lack of it. This is gonna be good.

Grabs popcorn*

I don't particularly like discussions... I'd rather just say "agree to disagree" and have some sleep... also, it's not that I lack sources, but since I didn't start this, I refuse to provide them, though I can provide keywords so those interested can search for them themselves... It's a principle thing (you started, so it's your problem).

I'm just here for the show brother. Things like these usually ends up in the legendary history of this forum. So break a leg!

I didn't either until I actually bought an Xbox One. Every generation, I buy all three consoles because I like to have all the exclusives that they offer but this gen, it's the first time I'm kind of regretting it and it's 100% because of the controller. The design of the Xbox One controller is great but those dead zones makes certain games so much worse. COD being the bigget offender. 

You obviously weren't around during the PS2 days lol

I was actually. Been around since the NES days x ) Also had a PS2 with my own set of favorites on the system. : D

Why? All multiplats sell better on other platforms.  it makes no sense on the developers end to want to be purchased by MS.  If anything, it would make sense to be exclusive to the largest fanbase available - either PC or PS4.

In fact, the only way Microsoft deserves to have exclusive titles at this point are if they develop them themselves.  The latest 3rd party exclusive in Tomb Raider had piss poor launch sales that would normally not be enough to sustain that kind of developer.  It's a loss for the developer, it's a loss for MS, it's a loss for the publisher.... literally the only winner here are the miniscule amount of players that bought it.