Not bias, just bad taste. Devil's third + FF > every other Wii U game combined.

I haven't played those games, but we all know how marketing, presentation, popular opinion(mostly from internet peeps who never played the game) and budget is important to reviewers. If you're not buying the game for these aspects, it's common sense not to trust them.

Yo-kai watch deserved a lot better IMO.

Lol, don't worry, your theory will be confirmed with Star Fox, the next 2nd party exclusive master piece getting crushed by critcs.

But more importantly, all those games are sure master pieces, or maybe you only have those to play and force you to think that way. But the rest of the world got it wrong, not you.

This is the 3rd time I say this in this freaking thread. He is not biased for Nintendo, he is a playstation fan and he don't have the wiiu so his opinion is not related to any kind of biasement. Is just an opinion. One that I think is wrong but stop that nonsense acusations and stop firing shots at the console and other games on the console because that´s not the point of the thread at all.

Rodea's low Wii U score is deserved, while its not a bad game it doesn't deserve higher than a 5/10

I must've imagined Bayonetta 2's 91 metacritic.

Do you think maybe...that they deserve those scores?

Hmm I think i will find out all three games you mentioned next month x-mas. Fatal Frame came out only digital version, correct?

After Bayonetta 2, all major third party support left the wii u leaving the wii u with the bottom of the barrel for 3rd party games.

Is it really surprising that those games recieved some of the lowest scores? Was Rodea the sky soldier supposed to be a contender for game of the year?

Hashtag conspiracy. I don't know about Rodea but the first Fatal Frame on PS2 actually only got a 74, biased against PS2? As for Devil's Third; it honestly looks like a really bad game, simple as that.
This conspiracy talk has gotten insane in the 8th gen.

Mad Max and Need for Speed on PS4 both have 69 metascore, bias or just not great games? 64 metascore for Need for Speed on Xbox One, that's some horrible bias right there.
Assassin's Creed Unity has a 72 metascore, that's clearly not on the developer but rather the spectacular bias of metacritic.
Thief, a big budget a highly anticipated title only has 67 on metacritic for PS4 and 69 for One, they hate the Xbox One but clearly hate the PS4 even more, there's nothing wrong with the game itself.
The Order: 1886 only has a measly 63 metascore; which is obviously wrong and only due to bias.
Murdered: Soul Suspect has a 59 metascore, this is clearly a conspiracy against Sony we're dealing with here.
Knack has a 54, the conspiracy is obvious now.

Ryse: Son of Rome has a 60 metascore, fantastic game, conspiracy just striking again.
Murdered: Soul Suspect has a 51 metascore on One, they hate Xbox more than Playstation, confirmed.

See where I'm going with this? If a developer makes a mediocre or bad game; that's not to blame on reviewers or metacritic and this whole conspiracy thing is getting really, really old.