By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - AngryJoe reviews Halo 5

awesome review, joe is defeniantley one of the reviewers most to be trusted when it comes to big media and celebreties on youtube. 

People should stop defending microtransactions and a mediocore 4 hour campaign just because there is a multiplayer you like



Around the Network
foodfather said:
Immersiveunreality said:
Thread title is better called: Does a different oppinion relate to moneygrabbing or is ego clouding gamecommunitys mind?
Cause damn alot of posters in here really act butthurt about this review and make invalid assumptions on top of that.
angry joe is a halofan himself,played trough the whole game and he also summed up the good things about it,the negatives we got shown right in our faces so he doesnt make them up.
His review is valid for me and the score is also his right to give.


Most of the review is BULLSHIT and thats a fact. 

Just because he rushed the campaign in co-op doesn't mean it only takes 4hrs to complete. Pleanty of people have been playing it for 7+ hours. 

His points on microtransactions were complete BS. It does not take 10+ games to hit 10k points. If he was any good at the game, he'd be req'ign gold every 5 or six games. 

His other stupid and invalid points like lack of BTB have already been addressed bt 343.

Anyone with half a brain would see 15 free DLC maps. = Multiplayer experience of the generation. Automatic 10/10 for MP alone. 

so you call a subjective opinion bullshit because of your own subjective opinion? Is that right?



ClassicGamingWizzz said:
The same boss for 6 times - No different to Souls games and MGS5 then huh? 
AI is dumb - AI is fantastic actually. just a little buggy at times. 
Short campaign - Fair enough, but there are dozens, hundreds of hours in the MP
False advertisment of the campaign - How is this an issue, everybody knew Locke was playable in Halo 5.
You almost dont play with master chief -They virtually play the same. How is this an issue?
Story is bad - Just like MGS5 then huh?
Random system to unlock shit in the game just to make you spend money on microtransactions - You don't need to buy shit. Play good, get good Req's simple as that. Play like Angry Joe, get fuck all. 

As much as the multiplayer is good i fail to see how the game got the scores it got. Hands down the most underated game so far this gen. Deserves at least 90 based on the MP alone. 



JRPGfan said:

4 hours 30 mins.... campagne on normal mode.

Almost a hour of that is Cutscenes.


That is not even close. If there is 30min of cutscenes it´s more than I thought. 

And to be honest I´m disapointed they weren´t longer and more frequent.

But any way, Joe didn´t played Halo 4 and he said he dind´t touched a XOne controler in almost one year. He didn´t take time to explore or even admire the envaironment.

It´s sad he had become such a bitter player. 



Ruler said:

awesome review, joe is defeniantley one of the reviewers most to be trusted when it comes to big media and celebreties on youtube. 

People should stop defending microtransactions and a mediocore 4 hour campaign just because there is a multiplayer you like


I tend to avoid his reviews on anything until after I finish it because he loves to give spoilers. He can't help himself!  But whether he is to be trusted?  Reviews are, of course, just opinions.  Sometimes, we agree.  Other times, we disagree with the reviewer. Take his Man of Steel review (where he actually claimed the movie did well because HE told people to go see it!) where he piled on tons of praise.

With any review, I tend to take the facts and decide which of their complaints will bother me, which ones I can overlook, and which ones are total boner killers.  It has served me well, thus far.



Around the Network
Sprash said:
foodfather said:
Immersiveunreality said:
Thread title is better called: Does a different oppinion relate to moneygrabbing or is ego clouding gamecommunitys mind?
Cause damn alot of posters in here really act butthurt about this review and make invalid assumptions on top of that.
angry joe is a halofan himself,played trough the whole game and he also summed up the good things about it,the negatives we got shown right in our faces so he doesnt make them up.
His review is valid for me and the score is also his right to give.


Most of the review is BULLSHIT and thats a fact. 

Just because he rushed the campaign in co-op doesn't mean it only takes 4hrs to complete. Pleanty of people have been playing it for 7+ hours. 

His points on microtransactions were complete BS. It does not take 10+ games to hit 10k points. If he was any good at the game, he'd be req'ign gold every 5 or six games. 

His other stupid and invalid points like lack of BTB have already been addressed bt 343.

Anyone with half a brain would see 15 free DLC maps. = Multiplayer experience of the generation. Automatic 10/10 for MP alone. 

so you call a subjective opinion bullshit because of your own subjective opinion? Is that right?

Not subjective at all. 

Microtransactions being a non issue is a fact. If you feel the need to buy them, you suck at the game. Fact. 

Story is only 4 hours long when you rush it / co-op it on normal. Every other Halo game can be completed in 3 hours even if on normal and co - op. Play it solo, its 7+ hours easy. Fact. 

Only subjective part is whether you like the story or not. 



Dang, that was a long review, but it does sound like it is riddled with a lot of issues that overall drops down the game. Sounds like it is rather disappointing for a Halo game... : X



 

              

Dance my pretties!

The Official Art Thread      -      The Official Manga Thread      -      The Official Starbound Thread

Was he drunk while reviewing the game? The campaign is the same length as halo 4 i would say. The multiplayer is the better than halo 3(which was my favorite).

For me its not perfect but it is still the best fps game i've played this gen (ps4x1)



Kyuu said:
Campaign's length is a serious flaw. I don't remember the last time I finished a game in less than 6 hours on a first playthrough. The difficulty excuse is ridiculous because a game's length is not determined by the number of times you die and respawn. As long as you play it skillfully and avoid death or keep it at minimum, higher difficulty settings will not add that much to the playtime. This is unless you're speedrunning.


The way Halo campains are structured the only way they make they longer is bloating each level with more waves of enemies or make bullet sponge bosses...

that is Destiny in a nuttshell.

Bungie might have realised that with Firefight. In Reach FF was the best and fastest way to level up and unlock armor pieces.

I have more problems with the first 2/3 of the campain because I have little idea of Chief and Lock motivations . The last third thought is preaty good emotional wise.



It's really weird how Sony fans see something that doesn't relate to them from a negative perspective and and XB1 fans see something that DOES relate to them from a positive perspective. What we need is a huge Halo fan to give us an honest perspective on Halo 5 ...

... Or maybe we don't.



 

The PS5 Exists.