By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - UK Charts WEEK ENDING 10 October 2015

Not a racing fan but nice to see great leg from forza. Disappointing UC number.



Around the Network
GribbleGrunger said:
walsufnir said:


We don't know whether the distribution is equal among all bundles (probably not, Star Wars will easily sell the most because of known reasons). Also people will buy a console with 4 games instead of getting one? Those crazy people seeing more value in 4 games than in 1.

Also, I won't downplay game sales because of bundling, that "invention" in forum ammunition is way too old for it. I say that the game will stay in the UK charts because of bundling. You are free to disagree with that, of course.

Yes, I agree that a bundle with more than one game is a different proposition, but you didn't say it will be bundled with other games, you said:

'Of course it will have legs because of the bundling'.


But isn't it the same situation as Forza then? People are saying it flopped yet it has great legs. First thing somebody will pop in and say is bundles. Is Forza selling those consoles or is the console selling Forza?



jlmurph2 said:


But isn't it the same situation as Forza then? People are saying it flopped yet it has great legs. First thing somebody will pop in and say is bundles. Is Forza selling those consoles or is the console selling Forza?

Yes, it's just as stupid. People will say that Halo did so well because it was bundled, but the only reason they bought the Halo bundle is because they wanted Halo. It's as much a sale of the game as it is a sale of the console. in fact I'd say it's more significant a sale of the game because people actually bought the console to go with it. The argument changes when a game is given away for free, such as TLOUR or Titanfall. Then you can't really see that as a sale of the game because, let's face it, even if the free game was only Tony Hawkes people would choose that option over a console without a game at all. The argument also changes when a bundle comes with multiple games added. If Sony added The Nathan Drake Collection to the TLOUR bundle then you'd have to accept it's likely that people bought the bundle for TLOUR more than Nathan Drake. Not in every case but at least there's a debate to be had.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


GribbleGrunger said:
jlmurph2 said:


But isn't it the same situation as Forza then? People are saying it flopped yet it has great legs. First thing somebody will pop in and say is bundles. Is Forza selling those consoles or is the console selling Forza?

Yes, it's just as stupid. People will say that Halo did so well because it was bundled, but the only reason they bought the Halo bundle is because they wanted Halo. It's as much a sale of the game as it is a sale of the console. in fact I'd say it's more significant a sale of the game because people actually bought the console to go with it. The argument changes when a game is given away for free, such as TLOUR or Titanfall. Then you can't really see that as a sale of the game because, let's face it, even if the free game was only Tony Hawkes people would choose that option over a console without a game at all.

I thought Nathan Drake Collection was being given away for free too. Or is that not the case for UK?



Lawlight said:
vivster said:
Wow. Couldn't even beat a month old game.


24/09/2015 to 10/10/2015 is a month?

11/09 to 12/10 sounds like a month to me. What are you talking about?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
jlmurph2 said:

I thought Nathan Drake Collection was being given away for free too. Or is that not the case for UK?

Ah, now we're entering a different debate that I've touched upon in other threads. Are they giving the game away or are they changing $50 for it because the price drop is actually $100. Let's save this example for another time.



 

The PS5 Exists. 


GribbleGrunger said:
jlmurph2 said:

I thought Nathan Drake Collection was being given away for free too. Or is that not the case for UK?

Ah, now we're entering a different debate that I've touched upon in other threads. Are they giving the game away or are they changing $50 for it because the price drop is actually $100. Let's save this example for another time.


Then why would it be the same price as TLOU bundle? Which has a free game. Charging 50 for that would be a ripoff. 



jlmurph2 said:
Teeqoz said:


Using VGC numbers, they both did similar in terms of performance compared to the last mainline entry in the franchise. Expecting the NDC to come close to the MCC in terms of raw numbers in the UK wouldn't be founded in reality, because Halo is a much bigger franchise than Uncharted in the UK, so these numbers shouldn't really be that shocking at all.

 

UC3 - 132k first week, NDC - ~40k first week. Ratio: 3.25:1

Halo 4 - 378k first week, MCC - 103k first week. Ratio: ~3.7:1


But what about the install bases at the times? 360 was already beating PS3. When MCC released the install base was around 1 million. While PS4's is surely over 2million at the time Nathan Drake Collection released. Yet it sold less than half the copies.


VGC doesn't have first week numbers for all the Halo games in the UK, but at least worldwide, each mainline xbox 360 entry in the Halo franchise has shown to have approximately the same first week numbers, regardless of installbase (Halo 3: 3.8 million, Halo Reach: 3.6 million, Halo 4: 3.6 million). From that I think we can safely assume that the Halo franchise's sales isn't tied much to the installbase at all.

Uncharted's first week sales have increased together with installbase, but it could be argued that that's because franchise growth rather than installbase. In any case, if Uncharted's sales are tied to installbase, while Halo's sales evidently aren't, that would sort of be a benefit to Uncharted, rather than Halo.

 

TL;DR

If MCC and NDC both had launched this holiday, I don't think MCC had sold substantially more, simply because the Halo franchise has proven to be largely unnaffected by installbase. UCC may or may not have sold less had it launched last holiday, however I doubt it.

 

Either way, they both had similar ratios compared to their respective series, so I would say both performed basically equally well.



jlmurph2 said:
kurasakiichimaru said:



5 days vs 2 days of tracking? Hmmm.

Sony's  desperate I guess but atleast sales won't drop like a rock like MCC did on its 2nd week last year.


What does that matter? Do you think it'll be a big difference with 3 more days added on to it? 

If that's your argument it's seriously weak. The ratio one is a much better conclusion.


Maybe. But Halo and FPS is bigger in UK. What do you expect? 2 Days of UCC suddenly tops Halp MCC's sales of 5 days and during November. Lol



Teeqoz said:
jlmurph2 said:


But what about the install bases at the times? 360 was already beating PS3. When MCC released the install base was around 1 million. While PS4's is surely over 2million at the time Nathan Drake Collection released. Yet it sold less than half the copies.


VGC doesn't have first week numbers for all the Halo games in the UK, but at least worldwide, each mainline xbox 360 entry in the Halo franchise has shown to have approximately the same first week numbers, regardless of installbase (Halo 3: 3.8 million, Halo Reach: 3.6 million, Halo 4: 3.6 million). From that I think we can safely assume that the Halo franchise's sales isn't tied much to the installbase at all.

Uncharted's first week sales have increased together with installbase, but it could be argued that that's because franchise growth rather than installbase. In any case, if Uncharted's sales are tied to installbase, while Halo's sales evidently aren't, that would sort of be a benefit to Uncharted, rather than Halo.

 

TL;DR

If MCC and NDC both had launched this holiday, I don't think MCC had sold substantially more, simply because the Halo franchise has proven to be largely unnaffected by installbase. UCC may or may not have sold less had it launched last holiday, however I doubt it.

 

Either way, they both had similar ratios compared to their respective series, so I would say both performed basically equally well.

Well if install bases don't change much it makes me think these percentages they've been throwing don't have a lot of purpose. The whole "80% of players haven't played Uncharted" seems more of an excuse to make it than a reason.