By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Is The Legend of Zelda: Triforce Heroes going to be the lowest scoring Zelda game?

 

Is The Legend of Zelda: Triforce Heroes going to be the lowest scoring Zelda game?

Yes 28 26.17%
 
No 79 73.83%
 
Total:107
Skullwaker said:
I come from the future.

The answer is no.

Did you really come from the future?? Will humanity land on the moon again? Will global peace ever be achieved? Will Zelda U on both WiiU and NX???



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

Around the Network
Rogerioandrade said:
Are we skipping The Wand of Gamelon, The Faces of Evil and Zelda´s Adventure, right?

I think Triforce Heroes will still score above what Zelda II Adventure of Link scored......

Those aren't games. Those are burned off tattoes.



This is one of the few games I've been looking forward to. I'd be surprised if it got very low reviews.



No, it looks fantastic.



Skullwaker said:
I come from the future.

The answer is no.


Yeah, but actually, was I right about the NX?



Around the Network

The game looks sorta bad, but it doesn't look sub 73 on metacritic while being a Zelda game bad. Then of course, Ratchet & Clank: Into the Nexus got 76 on metacritic, so good games can get (relatively) low scores on meta as well.



Teeqoz said:
The game looks sorta bad, but it doesn't look sub 73 on metacritic while being a Zelda game bad. Then of course, Ratchet & Clank: Into the Nexus got 76 on metacritic, so good games can get (relatively) low scores on meta as well.

It looks 10 times worse than R & C into the Nexus lol. And I'm not talking graphics.



Samus Aran said:
Slarvax said:
Why would it? I don't see anything wrong with it.
And reviewers love Zelda eithr way. +80 just for being Zelda, but below 85 for being a spin off.

Everything is wrong with it. Graphics, art design, level design, gameplay, no voice chat (have fun playing online), tedious singleplayer, story, can't play with people across different continents online, etc.

The second lowest scoring Zelda game is 84% btw.

Oh come on Samus, half of the things you say here is simply false and the other half are minor problems.

Have you played ALBW to begin with? Because the graphics and artstyle of that game looked really good on my 3ds screen, in fact I'm replaying it right now and I'm thinking the same, this game looks elegantly beautiful, the way it translates ALTTP style to this age and day is remarkable, it may not look impressive on pictures but it really does its work once you play it.

The same goes to the gameplay, that game is superb in that sense and this one has the same, is impossible that the gameplay is bad, in ALBW even cutting the grass is fun.

The story? really? the story? that´s the important thing on a 3 co-op multiplayer zelda spin - off, the story?? when even some of the biggest zelda games have pretty standart stories... just no.

The voice chat? What? So you don´t think that´s a big deal on Splatoon and suddlenly it is a big deal with this one?? There is 8 fundamental messages you can easily send to your mates with only the touch of your finger, that´s more comunication that you need, Nintendo is definitely not realising a game where kids can talk to strange people, and you know that.

The level design i have seen in all the new videos does not look bad at all, is like a mix between four swords and ALBTW but with the puzzles made for 3 people and more cooperative than 4 swords. 

The tedious singleplayer is the only one of your complainst that seems it could be valid, but on a game that is so heavily focused on the multiplayer, it is pretty normal if the singleplayer is not as good as the multi, we have seen that before many times in many great games. And not to be able to play with people in different continent sounds like a very minor complain, is gonna be a problem for a vast minority, mostly people like us that play with people we meet in forums, but even in that case there is a lot of european and NA and even japanese people here for instance.

It is not going to be the lowest scoring Zelda, in fact it looks pretty good for what it is .







Darwinianevolution said:
Skullwaker said:
I come from the future.

The answer is no.

Did you really come from the future?? Will humanity land on the moon again? Will global peace ever be achieved? Will Zelda U on both WiiU and NX???

By far the most pressing issue lol



Samus Aran said:
Teeqoz said:
The game looks sorta bad, but it doesn't look sub 73 on metacritic while being a Zelda game bad. Then of course, Ratchet & Clank: Into the Nexus got 76 on metacritic, so good games can get (relatively) low scores on meta as well.

It looks 10 times worse than R & C into the Nexus lol. And I'm not talking graphics.


Yaaah, but like I said, I think 76 was way too low for Nexus, and, let's be honest, reviewers have a little tendency to score certain franchises high regardless (Let's not kid ourselves).

 

I wish I could say this game would certainly score less than Into the Nexus, but I doubt that will be the reality.