By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Ubisoft fails the ps3 again: Rainbow six 2 review

Why review a game twice? If almost all of what is said about the Xbox360 version applies to the PS3 version, when it comes to reviewing the PS3 one, all they need to do is say what is different between versions. Then it's up to the user, if he trusts the review to make his own subjective judgement on how much the differences affect them.

Who cares about the SS's here? Seriously! They both look good, no point in getting worked up over it. Why not read that thread about image quality not being everything and focus on the gameplay?



Tease.

Around the Network

point two difference between the reviews, big deal. Thats not much of a difference.



They seem pretty close to one another... At least in my opinon!



 

 

 

Guitar Hero 3/ Smash Hits

wow all the rainbow 6 bashing, i enjoyed vegas, it was a hard ass game, slow tactical shooters are fun change up for me. but then again im a fan of the hitman games where, you may not shoot someone the whole level.

People complaining about the speed of the game, go play cod4. RSV2 is built for a different crowd. I personally can not wait to get my copy. the new squad commands and smarter A.I sounds good. My only hope is they stop that enemies spawn in response to your movement bullshit, spawn them at the beginning even if it has to be random, or semi random... I hate running out of time looking for the last guy that never spawns, and has not spawned because he does not respond to gun fire or grenades going off.

in short the first game was an overlooked gem due to its release date in proximity to Gears, I own both and have found rainbow to take up more of my time and to enjoy it more. even with it being just more of the same with minor tweeks it should be a good addition to any gaming library

after all minor tweeks are all C&C, civilization, simcity, has really done in a decade+ and i still get a kick out of their games



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

bbsin said:

I don't see how Ubi soft failed the PS3 again.

Sure, the PS3 has worse framerate (probably not by alot), but graphically both version look on par to each other.

The PS3 has a warmer color palette (like usual), better lighting, and better AA according to those pictures.

The Xbox360 version has better contrast and crisper textures.

there's not huge difference between both versions in terms of visuals at all. Each version has it's advantages.

http://static.videogamer.com/videogamer/images/pub/misc/vsmarch18rb6v2large01.jpg

http://static.videogamer.com/videogamer/images/pub/misc/vsmarch18rb6v2large03.jpg

I like the comparisons,i'll just have to play the game myself on the ps3 and i'll make my judgement.

 



iWillCrushAllWhoDefyMe!                                                                           PN ID- DrivenToExcell -if you want to add me to your friends list tell me where you know me from(vgchartz) www.twitter.com/driventoexcell

Around the Network

@london_calling

easily the best FAIL pic i've ever seen, hats off to you...



Demon's Souls Official Thread  | Currently playing: Left 4 Dead 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, Magicka

All multiplatform Xbox360 / PS3 games are ports of each other. It's the only viable solution financially.

Yet, Ubisoft is going the EA way; full of crap and rehashes.



Would not surprise me if EA end up buying Ubisoft. EA buys up every other company.



From the screenshots i think the PS3 looks better overall. The lack of AA on the 360 one is really bad.



Ive played a mod on unreal tournament 3 (ps3) where its in 3rd person and it looked identical to gears of war in terms of detail, lighting, except it was much larger. I remember hearing a rumor about epic having problems fitting ut3 on a regular dvd for the 360, i call bs but any one else heard anything similiar?

At topic: Those screen shots looked identical to me and im not interested in vegas games so meh.