Oh and we still have a vigilante i believe, who im guessing would be big boss.
Oh and we still have a vigilante i believe, who im guessing would be big boss.
zero129 said:
I want big boss. |
Liquid?
theprof00 said: Oh yes but most importantly you were at cones house last night |
So, are you role claiming or just theorizing.
I can definitely see the strategy murdering the person you were against to paint you as scum, that said, if scum really didn't like you, then they would have killed you earlier imo.
zero129 said:
Ok, so now your trying to base what you say around that i killed cone?. Yes you are skilled but you really are acting un skilled in this game. This is not how you play as town at all.. |
I'm not wasting any more of my time talking to you. You can either vote with me or against me, the end of the game will tell who was unskilled and who was not.
outlawauron said:
So, are you role claiming or just theorizing.
I can definitely see the strategy murdering the person you were against to paint you as scum, that said, if scum really didn't like you, then they would have killed you earlier imo. |
Why would killing a random player paint me as scum, outlaw?
I don't think that scum don't like me, I think they'd just aim to lynch me at a certain point, because in my history, I'm usually protected. In most games, I'm protected almost every night. I was protected night one this game, I know that for a fact. 100%. I don't know if I was protected last night.
theprof00 said:
Why would killing a random player paint me as scum, outlaw? I don't think that scum don't like me, I think they'd just aim to lynch me at a certain point, because in my history, I'm usually protected. In most games, I'm protected almost every night. I was protected night one this game, I know that for a fact. 100%. I don't know if I was protected last night. |
In that hypothetical scenario, you were against Cone because they posed a threat. Killed them at next opportunity so that you would have one less person against you, without having to wait/try to convince everyone else to vote lynch.
theprof00 said: Oh and we still have a vigilante i believe, who im guessing would be big boss. |
I doubt it..
For the first night 3 people were killed.. by who? Mafia, Serial Killer and Vigilante
And Clyde was killed during night 2, meaning that the other two kills are from the Mafia and Serial Killer
If there was 2 vigilantes, then there should have been 4 kills and 3 kills, given that they didn't target the doctor's pick
NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
- Official VGChartz Tutorial Thread -
NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
Here lies the hidden threads.
| |
Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread
| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]
Well looks like things got interesting, I'll stick with my main suspects, Platina and Axum. Mr. defended platina back when I was arguing with him so clearly they are together. Now in Axum's case, Zero said that one of the two guys (Axum and me) that voted for Mr. was mafia voting for one of his own in order to gain the town trust. Axum voted for him after I went out of my way to exposed Mr. so if Zero's theory is true, Axum is guilty. I'm still not completely sure about Zero's theory and I'll wait until Axum says something.
The truth right now is Mr. and Platina are mafia, however both are new at this game, so in order for mafia to win they need at least one experienced player. This veteran player must be the one controlling both platina and Mr. actions. In platina's case he's been told to stay quiet and lurking, while in Mr. case he was ordered back when I called him out to go out of his way to overdefend himself so he can be the obvious target, here fits Zero's theory where in this case Axum voted for him to prove his loyalty to town.
We can get rid of platina right now or we can risk it and try to find who is behind him and Mr.
outlawauron said:
In that hypothetical scenario, you were against Cone because they posed a threat. Killed them at next opportunity so that you would have one less person against you, without having to wait/try to convince everyone else to vote lynch. |
Hmmm, I see what you mean now. I was thinking that if Cone had been scum, then it would make me look town, but you seem to be saying that regardless of cone's alignment, it could be interpreted as me simply removing an obstacle.
I guess that's true, but I think the cone kill was just a "best possible scenario 50/50".
I believe the cone kill was the sk.
And the reason for killing cone was "if prof's instincts are right, then cone is a good target for me because cone is mafia...and if prof is wrong, then prof is probably mafia".
This syncs up exactly with zero's rhetoric, just for what it's worth. ie; 'lynch prof, he was wrong about cone, and is being unskilled this game'.
I would bet money that zero is the sk, possible with a backup in xander.
Platina said:
For the first night 3 people were killed.. by who? Mafia, Serial Killer and Vigilante And Clyde was killed during night 2, meaning that the other two kills are from the Mafia and Serial Killer
If there was 2 vigilantes, then there should have been 4 kills and 3 kills, given that they didn't target the doctor's pick |
Cone is not a vigilante. Cone is a desperado. A desperado, by condition, will die if he targets a townie. Therefore, since cone didn't die by his own hands night one or two, cone never shot.