No, more money means generally more production value. Whether it shows on scale or dlc or graphics, variety, better models and so on is different dependant on the actual game and how the money is spent, of course.

I don't know why several people here lately only think in extremes, seriously.

But in which way exactly? I mean the CELL already has an emulator for the SPUs because they were indeed CPUs itself but not really conventional ones. I know CELL helped the GPU but that is too abstract to me. Go on and tell us how exactly CELL is similar to the PS4 GPU and where it's not :)

No, that's mean. I know what you are trying to say but seriously, they are not that similar, in my opinion. Yes, if you have a coarse look, they are similar but at a finer look they really are different and not much can be used in terms of written code.

But the best looking franchise on PS3 is cheaper than the best looking franchise on 360. Reason for that being difference in power and that ND and other developers know how to use Cell. Cell was a bad idea but it is by no mean unconquerable.  

While this is again subjective, it doesn't negate the point that money is crucial. How do you think the best looking franchise would look with $500.000?

Money is important but is not the reason why PS3 exclusives to most people looks better than 360 exclusives.

No, there are many, many other reasons for this, no point in arguing this.

Sorry I'll stop arguing a point that you brought in and argued to the bone for a considerable amount of time. 

In my opinion reasons for this is more powerful hardware, Sony do like to put Visuals higher on the tier list of importance cause makes marketing easier and a good bit of dev talent and art directions. 

So on one hand, Xbox held games back because they weren't on blu Ray. On the other, PS held games back because it was tough to develop for.

Obviously Nintendo was the one driving the industry forward!

PS3 was more powerful than the 360. Of course its exclusives by developers dedicated solely to making PS3 games looked better than 360 games. It doesn't change what this 3rd party developer of multiplatform games is saying.

Actually, when you bring up the exclusives, you're kind of proving his point, because you're purposely ignoring the enormous amount of 3rd party titles that again, even though the PS3 was more powerful, almost always looked or performed better on the 360. Yes, we all know Naughty Dog and GG games looked good. But that's irrelevant. I'm sure if DICE were given years to dedicate solely to PS3, they'd have gotten better looking and performing games onto PS3 easier. But they had other platforms to worry about as well.