By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Is PlayStation Just As Iconic As Nintendo?

BasilZero said:
Teeqoz said:
Playstation is more iconic (as in widely recognized) than Nintendo, but Nintendo franchises are more iconic than both Playstation and Nintendo combined. People know Mario, but they don't really know who the hell made it...


False.

Mario, Donkey Kong (1981) and Pokemon are.

Cant say the same for the rest of the Nintendo franchises - maybe Zelda....but barely - the rest lol - not so much.

 

"Pikmin, is that a new Pokemon?"


Mario, Pokemon and Donkey Kong are all Nintendo framchises though, and I didn't say all Nintendo franchises were more iconic that Playstation+Nintendo.

 

Rekt.



Around the Network

I suppose much of individual perception has to do with what generation a given individual is from and how long they have been actively following the industry, presumably as a consumer rather than as a casual observer.

I would argue that by the late 90s, the Playstation brand had eclipsed Nintendo as a gaming icon in terms of market relevance. Certainly by the 00s with the rise of the PS2, the Playstation brand was cemented as the default brand in gaming. However, Nintendo has more iconic internally created IPs than Playstation due to differences in how each company approached brand building.

For Nintendo, their brand was synonymous with their IPs and the characters that made them. That is strong branding considering that some of their most popular IPs date back to the 80s (Mario, Metroid, Zelda).

By contrast, the Playstation brand has new IPs with each generation that largely define a given generation's console software library. IPs that remain relevant over two hardware generations are rare exceptions in contrast to Nintendo's approach to each generation gets a new version of previously existing Nintendo IPs with omissions being the rare exception.



BasilZero said:
Teeqoz said:


Mario, Pokemon and Donkey Kong are all Nintendo framchises though, and I didn't say all Nintendo franchises were more iconic that Playstation+Nintendo.

 

Rekt.


But you said no one knows Nintendo D:!?

You are confusing, staph.


I said "People" not "All people", so you are wrong again.

 

Tyrranosaurus Rekt.



BasilZero said:
Teeqoz said:
Playstation is more iconic (as in widely recognized) than Nintendo, but Nintendo franchises are more iconic than both Playstation and Nintendo combined. People know Mario, but they don't really know who the hell made it...


False.

Super Mario, Pikachu , Donkey Kong (1981) and Pokemon are.

Cant say the same for the rest of the Nintendo franchises - maybe Zelda....but barely - the rest lol - not so much.

 

"Pikmin, is that a new Pokemon?"

"Huh? Those Pokemon are all copies of each other!"



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

d21lewis said:

Jay Z vs Elvis

Shrek vs Mickey Mouse

Sony vs Nintendo

 

 

Toyota vs Honda

Apples and oranges.

 

Everyone's personal preferences are just pouring all over this thread.  So many shades of grey...

 



Feel free to check out my stream on twitch 

Around the Network
Aeolus451 said:
Goodnightmoon said:
People really don´t understand the word iconic, they are thinking on the word popular instead.


Many of the users like you seem to think we're comparing mascots when it's about the brands themselves. Playstation has become the symbol/icon of gaming a while ago.  How revelent a brand is in the market matters because it's about which brand is more iconic. 

In order for something to remain the symbol of an entire industry, it has to remain popular or revelent otherwise it becomes just the icon of days long since passed.  Everyone knows of nintendo and it's mascots but not many gamers actually want to experience it's games. it's no different than the music that old people listen to. It is completely out of touch with gaming of today and has become less iconic than playstation. 

Icon, a person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something.


More people than sony's games at least, lol. Does Sony even have a single ten million+ selling franchise?



well 3 generation wins out of 4 can't hurt,let's see where the brand image is when this gen closes

But no,nothing will take Mario & nintendo down icon wise



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

Ka-pi96 said:
Samus Aran said:

More people than sony's games at least, lol. Does Sony even have a single ten million+ selling franchise?

Yes, they do. Gran Turismo or TLOU for example. And maybe in a couple years time Uncharted will be at that level too.

Since when do we count remasters as extra sales of one game?

I guess Pokémon Red/Blue (green) sold 46M then.

So just GT then.



Well, this topic is going as well as predicted. One thing that's struck me while thinking on this is Sony isn't great at getting branded merchandise out in the wild. I see Nintendo stuff everywhere, even if the people wearing it doesn't play any longer. Yoshi backpacks, NES controller t-shirts, ?-block keychains & (NINTENDO) on a lanyard... but then again, you don't have other game publishers putting out mass market merch very often (aka, stuff you can find at Walmart or other very common retailers). That presence only further cements the icon of classic Nintendo.



Ka-pi96 said:

Bit different. TLOU was effectively a cross gen game. The Pokemon Red/Blue remakes were... actual full remakes.

I was talking about Pokémon Yellow though. TP was a cross-gen game, TLOU wasn't.