pleased i made the play offs,had quite a few bad weeks,
good job as ever rol
Who will win Super Bowl 50? | |||
Patriots | 116 | 25.00% | |
Seahawks | 41 | 8.84% | |
Colts | 7 | 1.51% | |
Packers | 42 | 9.05% | |
Broncos | 85 | 18.32% | |
Ravens | 8 | 1.72% | |
Cowboys | 18 | 3.88% | |
Panthers | 56 | 12.07% | |
Other | 74 | 15.95% | |
Scoreboard | 17 | 3.66% | |
Total: | 464 |
pleased i made the play offs,had quite a few bad weeks,
good job as ever rol
RolStoppable said:
Rumor has it that Fat Eddy eats babies for breakfast. Anyway... Something serious: Outside of this thread you've become known as a prophet for your wacky "Redskins will win NFC East" prediction and now people wonder if you have something left in the bag for the NFL playoffs. This week's Brian Billick column had a list of playoff odds, with one criterion being the most likely one-and-done team in each conference. His pick for the AFC were the Denver Broncos (yes, the 1st seed in the conference). Now what do you say? Will Peyton Manning defy all logic and throw for 400+ yards and 4+ TDs in three straight games to win the Super Bowl? |
My magic 8-ball seems to point to no. Not necessarily that DEN can't win the AFC, but that level of performance from his team for 3x games in a row ... ehhhhh I don't know. To get those kinds of numbers, generally teams are playing from behind and saying 'screw running the ball, throw it like a madman!', and with Denver's D, I don't see that being a real concern. I rather think that the AFC playoff games outside of the Steelers could be kind of boring defensive, grindy ball.
RolStoppable said:
Playing from behind will be easy for Denver. You know, I didn't say anything about interceptions in my previous post. Screwing the running game should also be a non-issue, because with Manning playing from the shotgun formation, the ground game won't get any traction anyway. |
Hahah :) Well, if PM starts throwing INTs like he is prone to doing, then I could see him getting benched for BO in short order, making him doing 3x games of 400+ and a bunch of TDs even less likely :D Either way, this sounds like crazy talk to me.
RolStoppable said:
He wouldn't get benched if his stats are still on the good side. No team changes QBs when the starter is at 250 yards, 2 TDs and 2 INTs during a game. Just needs such a balance to be there. But sure, this is crazy talk to you, yet the Redskins winning the NFC East was a realistic scenario in week 2. |
Hahaha hell yes :D
Only one thing can satiate Azazel now, and that is Cousins hoisting the Lombardi in February.
Texans looking every bit the playoff team we thought they'd be.
Edit: nicely timed by me.
RolStoppable said:
No. The league should have skipped to a Green Bay vs. Pittsburgh Super Bowl right away. |
That'd be one way to make sure Yackety Sax became the official Super Bowl theme song.
MTZehvor said: Probably. We need the laughs. |
This game has done some delivering, but I'm holding out hope for a Buttfumble level of greatness.