By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sports - The NFL Thread 2015: Denver Broncos win Super Bowl 50

 

Who will win Super Bowl 50?

Patriots 116 25.00%
 
Seahawks 41 8.84%
 
Colts 7 1.51%
 
Packers 42 9.05%
 
Broncos 85 18.32%
 
Ravens 8 1.72%
 
Cowboys 18 3.88%
 
Panthers 56 12.07%
 
Other 74 15.95%
 
Scoreboard 17 3.66%
 
Total:464

SEA-SF 1 BUF-JAC 1
TB-WAS 3 ATL-TEN 1
NO-IND 2 MIN-DET 1 PIT-KC 1 CLE-STL 2
HOU-MIA 2 NYJ-NE 2 OAK-SD 1 DAL-NYG 2
PHI-CAR 2 BYE   BYE   BAL-ARI 2 by 3





Around the Network
Arkaign Predicts:
SEA-SF 1 BUF-JAC 1
TB-WAS 2 ATL-TEN 1
NO-IND 2 MIN-DET 1 PIT-KC 1 CLE-STL 2
HOU-MIA 2 NYJ-NE 2 OAK-SD 2 DAL-NYG 1
PHI-CAR 2 BYE   BYE   BAL-ARI 2 x 17

Lot of tossups here. Seattle could continue to unravel. Cleveland could catch STL on a zero-offense day. Oakland could rock SD. Etc. Not a single one of these do I feel 100% about.



RolStoppable said:

People shouldn't put too much stock in those strength of schedule stats. Teams that win a lot will automatically move closer to the bottom, because handing out a loss to another team means that their schedule got easier due to that other team now having a worse record than before. Essentially, teams get punished for winning games.

The same thing applies vice versa, so you can't really say that the teams who lost a lot of games did so because they faced such good opponents, because there's also the possibility that such loser teams are plain and simply bad. In other words, they would lose a lot of games regardless of their schedule.

I don't consider these strength of schedule rankings useful at all.


I think you are butthurt because your team has an easy schedule every year. Lions suck. Vikings suck and the bears suck almost every year.



Ugh. UGH!



7-7 this week, disgusting



                                                                                     

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
chocoloco said:

I think you are butthurt because your team has an easy schedule every year. Lions suck. Vikings suck and the bears suck almost every year.

Yeah... you aren't just bad at spelling, but also logical thinking. Any team with a positive record will have a hard time to finish in the top 10 of strength of schedule.

Stats exist to attempt to reveal truths. You're no statician. All science including stats will admit it is not flawless. I know your life education comes from vgc, so you might not undersytand that.



OfficerRaichu15 said:
Chris Hu said:
The only reason the Colts versus Patriots game was even somewhat close is because of Brady's pick six otherwise it would have been close to a blowout. Also as I said last week the Panthers are legit, they might not have receiving core but they have the second best tight end in the league in Greg Olson and the defense is pretty good the only team in the NFC that is better right now are the Packers.

Tyler Eifert would like to have a word with you.


Before this weeks games Eifert had a slightly better season but Olson pulled ahead this week and when you look at both of their entire careers Olson is miles ahead.



RolStoppable said:
chocoloco said:

Stats exist to attempt to reveal truths. You're no statician. All science including stats will admit it is not flawless. I know your life education comes from vgc, so you might not undersytand that.

Have you ever heard the saying "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.", and do you know what it means?

I do not care. Why should I? Even if it is qoute from a statician This convesation will go nowhere because I think you like to troll and you will convince me of nothing. Vgc is a site all about stats.



Oh sweet, I moved up a good amount of spots this week.



My first #1 week, only because everyone else did poorly lol. Goldenboy got lucky with me too.