By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - What is Gamefreak doing?

Salnax said:
First, Pokemon is not an annual series, though it does seem that way sometimes. Though Game Freak typically releases three(ish) games per Pokemon cycle (New Region, Remake, and Third Version), they still typically take more than a single year to release new games. Most notably, there was two year gap between Emerald and Diamond/Pearl, another two year wait for Platinum, and a 21 month wait between Black/White and their sequels.

Even if Game Freak is working on a relatively simple third version, aka Pokemon Z, they might as well wait until 2016 to release it. It would coincide with the 20th anniversary, give as much time as Emerald or Platinum took to make, and possibly spare resources for Generation 7 of the series.

Game Freak's next Pokemon generation will likely be a late 2017 release, four years after X/Y. That would likely be during or shortly after the launch of Nintendo's next generation handheld. If this is the case, Pokemon 7 could likely be a killer app for the NX's launch. It could have console features depending on how the NX works, though it would probably be primarily a handheld game.

Hence my statemenet in the OT, "Pokemon is normally annual" I did not say it WAS. I said it was NORMALLY. Which does NOT mean all the time. 

I said keep it civil. This is a speculation thread, not a "You are wrong here and wrong there and this is that and that is this and I know what they are doing" kind of thread.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Around the Network
BraLoD said:
Paatar said:


Pokemon is a much larger project and is relatively complex when you get into balancing the Pokemon (with each new gen)


Pokemon is pretty simple and rely on the same things for like 20 years.

It's also a yearly franchise and not technically a big thing as well, it just sells a ton, really.

Not saying it's bad or anything, I love it, it's just not big at all.

(it is larger compared with Tembo indeed)


So with you saying because it has been relying on the same concepts, as EVERY OTHER FRANCHISE EVER MADE... it's not big? 

So Assassin's Creed isn't big. Super Smash Bros isn't big. Mario isn't big. GTA isn't big. Nothing is big because they use the same ideas? 

Each new entry to all those franchises adds a new mechanic, just like Pokemon. Most recently, it added Mega Evolution and a lot went into the balancing and decision making for those games. It is not a big scale project like The Witcher III, you are correct. However, it is not as small as you are implying it is.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

I'm entertaining the possibility that new Pokemon will be a launch title for Nintendo's next handheld.



 

BraLoD said:
Paatar said:


So with you saying because it has been relying on the same concepts, as EVERY OTHER FRANCHISE EVER MADE... it's not big? 

So Assassin's Creed isn't big. Super Smash Bros isn't big. Mario isn't big. GTA isn't big. Nothing is big because they use the same ideas? 

Each new entry to all those franchises adds a new mechanic, just like Pokemon. Most recently, it added Mega Evolution and a lot went into the balancing and decision making for those games. It is not a big scale project like The Witcher III, you are correct. However, it is not as small as you are implying it is.


Assassin's Creed games are top quality AAA games, even as they are yearly there is an insane amount of man power behind it, and usually three years of development to each of them, a handheld game like Pokemon doesn't even share the same world as that game.

The last GTA took 5 years and one of the biggest budgets in a game to be made.

Both Mario and Smash does have their big console games as well.


You just re-read my statemenet incorrectly and began to use it against me like I did not know anything. 

I know all those franchises are huge. But your statement was because Pokemon uses the same concepts, it wasn't big. 

Therefore, by that logic that you said, all those other games would not be big. 

 

This is not about me, I NEVER said Assassin's Creed, GTA and etc were not big games. I said according to your logic, they weren't.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Slarvax said:
Paatar said:

So, as most of you know, Gamefreak has not revealed a new main series Pokemon game. Which is kind of odd since they normally release annually. The stuff they have announced aren't really big projects and they are basically all done. So, what are they doing? Are they just deciding not to release a main game this year? Are they making something bigger? New IP? Wii U Pokemon game? 

This is all speculation as we really do not know what they are doing. All options are realistic. Keep it civil guys.

There's the problem. They don't release annually. Between HG/SS and ORAS, they did... But before that, Pokemon wasn't a yearly release. They should be working on Pokemon Z, and keeping contact with Nintendo for the next handheld for Gen VII.

They were working on Tembo after ORAS probably... Was it the same Pokemon team? Doubt it, but I don't know.

It's pretty damn close to annual

Red/Green-1996

Blue-1997

Yellow-1998

Gold/Silver-1999

Crystal-2000

Ruby/Sapphire-2002

FireRed/LeafGreen-2004

Emerald-2004

Diamond/Pearl-2006

Platinum-2008

HeartGold/SoulSilver-2009

Black/White-2010

Black 2/White 2-2012

X/Y-2013

OmegaRuby/AlphaSapphire-2014



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Around the Network
BraLoD said:
Assassin's Creed games are top quality AAA games, even as they are yearly there is an insane amount of man power behind it, and usually three years of development to each of them, a handheld game like Pokemon doesn't even share the same world as that game.

The last GTA took 5 years and one of the biggest budgets in a game to be made.

Both Mario and Smash does have their big console games as well.





Official Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE Thread

                                      

Paatar said:
UncleScrooge said:
The next mainline Pokémon game, obviously. Black / White 2 was easy to develop so most of their resources went into X/Y at that point. Ruby / Sapphire was a remake based on an already developed graphics engine. That's why we got annual games. The new games just take a year longer to develop, that's all.

Also, releasing the franchise annually is probably a bad idea in the long run. But who knows, maybe we'll get a surprise announcement in August.


The next Pokemon games that are releasing, according to how they normally do it, would be X2 and Y2 or Z. So it would use the same engine as X/Y and ORAS. 

We don't know that. They publicly said they are done with special editions some while ago and Black / White 2 was the first full blown follow-up of an edition. You are right, the engine will be the same if the game stays on 3DS but they probably have to develop new content: New Pokémon, a new region, etc. That takes more time than recylcing 80% of a region (B/W2) or importing region + storyline from old games (R/S). 



My guess is for the next Pokemon game for 3DS



NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
 

  - Official  VGChartz Tutorial Thread - 

NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
 

          

 

 

Here lies the hidden threads. 

 | |

Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread

| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]

BraLoD said:
Skullwaker said:




Bugs ever existed, ever will, Pokemon is full of them as well.

It's true:



BraLoD said:
ARamdomGamer said:

It's true:


See? Bugs everywhere!

(don't let Misty see it tho)

I always wondered how would she react to Surskit due to its type (water/bug)