BraLoD said:
Paatar said:
So with you saying because it has been relying on the same concepts, as EVERY OTHER FRANCHISE EVER MADE... it's not big?
So Assassin's Creed isn't big. Super Smash Bros isn't big. Mario isn't big. GTA isn't big. Nothing is big because they use the same ideas?
Each new entry to all those franchises adds a new mechanic, just like Pokemon. Most recently, it added Mega Evolution and a lot went into the balancing and decision making for those games. It is not a big scale project like The Witcher III, you are correct. However, it is not as small as you are implying it is.
|
Assassin's Creed games are top quality AAA games, even as they are yearly there is an insane amount of man power behind it, and usually three years of development to each of them, a handheld game like Pokemon doesn't even share the same world as that game.
The last GTA took 5 years and one of the biggest budgets in a game to be made.
Both Mario and Smash does have their big console games as well.
|
You just re-read my statemenet incorrectly and began to use it against me like I did not know anything.
I know all those franchises are huge. But your statement was because Pokemon uses the same concepts, it wasn't big.
Therefore, by that logic that you said, all those other games would not be big.
This is not about me, I NEVER said Assassin's Creed, GTA and etc were not big games. I said according to your logic, they weren't.
