Timesplitters 2 I had (and still have) on the Nintendo Gamecube and it was the greatest disappointment ever in my gaming career! At least the single-player mode sucks, many say that the multiplayer-mode is a classic.
Does it looks good ? | |||
| Yes ! | 33 | 31.13% | |
| Yes and yes !! | 5 | 4.72% | |
| Yes x 9999 !!! | 22 | 20.75% | |
| Itagaki need to put more effort into it | 46 | 43.40% | |
| Total: | 106 | ||
Timesplitters 2 I had (and still have) on the Nintendo Gamecube and it was the greatest disappointment ever in my gaming career! At least the single-player mode sucks, many say that the multiplayer-mode is a classic.
Faelco said:
But you can find a lot of indies looking like that now, or just buy some old games, and have a better looking game like that. It's really really far from the "Nintendo exclusives quality".
They announced a free to play multiplayer PC version, so everyone can make is own opinion about that. |
I think most Nintendo games are indie quality. Trine 2 IMO looks much better, sounds better, its better designed and it's more unique than New Super Mario Bros U for example. Also, federation force seems mobile quality to me.
“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).
"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)
FunFan said:
Yup. I loved some of those brainless ps2 era shooters like TimeSplitters. This game has my attention cause dumb is fun. |
Yeah, but the first 2 TimeSplitters can get very hard, this game I'm not sure.
| FunFan said:
I think most Nintendo games are indie quality. Trine 2 IMO looks much better, sounds better, its better designed and it's more unique than New Super Mario Bros U for example. |
Then it seems, you don't have a clue what a game design is. Because even while NSMBU is maybe the weakest 2d-Mario game ever, but its still on totally different level from Trine 2 gameplay wise. Even with weaker graphics.
looks fine to me. What do people except? the wiiu is barley stronger than the xbox 360 and this game isnt using cartoony graphics it gets measured with AAA budget games while being devoloped for an underpowered system.
I would defeniattley buy it for the PS4 with higher framrate, i hope they port it over.
| Ruler said: looks fine to me. What do people except? the wiiu is barley stronger than the xbox 360 and this game isnt using cartoony graphics it gets measured with AAA budget games while being devoloped for an underpowered system. I would defeniattley buy it for the PS4 with higher framrate, i hope they port it over. |
The Wii U can easily pull off Uncharted or Halo like games. That's what people are comparing this to because that is what this is supposed to compete against.
I LOVE ICELAND!

KungKras said:
The Wii U can easily pull off Uncharted or Halo like games. That's what people are comparing this to because that is what this is supposed to compete against. |
so?
Sharu said:
Then it seems, you don't have a clue what a game design is. Because even while NSMBU is maybe the weakest 2d-Mario game ever, but its still on totally different level from Trine 2 gameplay wise. Even with weaker graphics. |
Or you just dont want to accept Nintendo is capable of making bad games. Even inferior to Indie games on many aspects. Now I mentioned four things In which I felt Trine 2 is better: graphics, sound, design and originality. You refuted only one: design. That makes me believe that you agree on every other point. You claim gameplay wise NSMBU is better than Trine 2? I completely disagree. Besides, the idea that NSMBU might had better gameplay, from the perspective of a lesser mind, doesn't do anything to refute my main point: That most Nintendo games are closer to Indie quality than AAA. That implies production values obviously, since great gameplay depend on creativity not on high budgets.
“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).
"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)
FunFan said:
Or you just dont want to accept Nintendo is capable of making bad games. Even inferior to Indie games on many aspects. Now I mentioned four things In which I felt Trine 2 is better: graphics, sound, design and originality. You refuted only one: design. That makes me believe that you agree on every other point. You claim gameplay wise NSMBU is better than Trine 2? I completely disagree. Besides, the idea that NSMBU might had better gameplay, from the perspective of a lesser mind, doesn't do anything to refute my main point: That most Nintendo games are closer to Indie quality than AAA. That implies production values obviously, since great gameplay depend on creativity not on high budgets. |
So NIntendo is able to make very good games with huge sales and do it for cheap.
How is it sounds bad?