Why dont a lot of the pro digital gamer understand that there are a shitton of gamer that LOVE to collect there games.

And you cant collect digital crap.

Its like buying a car and cant ride it since a AI does it for you thats what digital games are.

Physical, but just because Im a collector. I like to look at my PS1 games and remember all those games I played. Also I can play them whenever I want instead of waiting for a digital re-release.

But on this generation I'm being 50/50 digital/physical due to promotions and stuff.

Best world for me would be to buy a physical version only for collection purposes and receive the right to full install it on my PS4.

I'm 100% physical. I am perfectly fine with people buying digital (especially out of print games, as it makes it easier for me to get them at a cheaper price), but the problem for me is when I want to buy the current games in the future it will be harder to find copies as many skipped getting them physically. I won't go digital, even if that means that I will miss out on the digital-only games, as there so many games released physically that I will never be able to get them all.

I normally buy physical for my favorite series. As for others, it depends on the price and timing. I normally grab a game or two during the flash sales. I own about half physical and half digital on my PS4.

Physical, hands down. You can't trade your game for a different one that you want to play, or sell it, with a digital copy when you're done with it, like you can with physical.

The Order was a trap, overhyped game that was mediocre at best and I'd get rid of it too.

True, you can't have too many versions of the best. I've got One paperback, one hardcover, and one pocketbook trilogy version of LOTR. I have also an old VCR version of Top Gun from the eighties, which has to be older than me.

Anyways my point was that I saw used Witcher 3s on my local gamestop a week after its release. Nobody should buy a game speed through it and sell it fast just because they'd get better price out of it. The issue in these cases is not that gaming is expensive (though it is) but wrong prioritizing: people with little money shouldn't invest in gaming, but food, healthcare and paying their bills, entertainment comes after that.

Unless digital prices get significally lower than physical releases (at least Steam-like levels), physical will be around. The moment digital gets it, a lot of people would choose it over physical for the most part.

Re-read the opening paragraph of the OP and it should make sense to you

I don't think price is as irrelevant as you say. Remasters are sold at a more competitive price for a reason. Indies work like this too. There is no reason why AAA-titles could not start to attract more people with price. A person could also be interested in 2 games or more at the same time, again price will come into play.

Yes I agree with you digital at the moment is not where it should be. Physical is way better option and I said this in my first post. However digital is inevitable and I don't think it is nearly as bad as people say.

He said "none of this applies to Wii U or 3DS owners" when in fact, the only thing that doesn't apply to Wii U or 3DS owners is that the games are installed to the HDD (Which I also don't get how it is relevant to this discussion, for or against).