By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Tomb Raider vs Street Fighter Double Standards

ArchangelMadzz on 21 June 2015

The only reason Tomb Raider is a big deal because it's always been associated with PS. And Microsoft bought it because they can't make a game on Uncharted's level to compete.

And people are making a big deal when it's Timed and PS4 owners will just wait then by the game for the same price but with all the DLC and better visuals.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Around the Network
oniyide on 21 June 2015

it comes down to either you believe MS or not. And IMHO the way they handled the whole thing hell the way they have been handling things since the start of the gen, shady wording and outright lies. You cant blame people for not believing.

If they were really helping TR with development, why not say that when the game was OFFICIALLY announced, that makes no sense at all. So that leads me to believe that they arent helping with crap and its a bunch of BS, unless its marketing, that i could see.



oniyide on 21 June 2015

on another note why not just come out from the start and say TR would be on Xbox first? Just like Sony did with FF7remake



Normchacho on 21 June 2015
oniyide said:
it comes down to either you believe MS or not. And IMHO the way they handled the whole thing hell the way they have been handling things since the start of the gen, shady wording and outright lies. You cant blame people for not believing.

If they were really helping TR with development, why not say that when the game was OFFICIALLY announced, that makes no sense at all. So that leads me to believe that they arent helping with crap and its a bunch of BS, unless its marketing, that i could see.


They said they are helping "fund" the game, not develope it. Huge difference.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Normchacho on 21 June 2015
oniyide said:
on another note why not just come out from the start and say TR would be on Xbox first? Just like Sony did with FF7remake


Because to this day there are some people who still think TR is an Xbox exclusive. That's why.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Around the Network
Dgc1808 on 21 June 2015
Azzanation said:
Mystro-Sama said:
Street Fighter V wouldn't have been made if Sony didn't step in since Capcom was on their face.


You honestly think Capcons biggest franchise wasnt going to be made anymore if Sony hadnt steped in? Come on now.

Capcom has beenin financial trouble for some time now. When questioned in the past Ono has also alluded to Ultra and Omega Street Fighter existing because the budget for a sequal wasn't there http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ono-says-no-budget-for-street-fighter-v/1100-6411507/. 

It's quite possible we would have just gotten another SF4 upgrade this year instead of SF5 next year if SONY wasn't covering the tab. 



4 ≈ One

Dgc1808 on 21 June 2015
Acevil said:

I think a better example is pointing out the hypocrisy and double standard between Boyeneta 2 and SFV. You easily win that one.

In the end it is just a fanbase whinning they don't get to play another fanbases game. 

I fully agree with this post. These are to very comparable situations and the guys that were raging ove Bayo2 were on the silly side. 



4 ≈ One

Dusk on 21 June 2015
Normchacho said:
Dusk said:


My bad, Bobafett then. It's not timed, but it is exclusive.


Wait? Are you talking about the Disney Infinity starter pack? Really?

No, lol. I'm talking about Bobafett on Battlefront. Unless, I'm just going bonkers and thought I saw Bobafett was exclusive to PS4 during E3.

Actually. After looking and looking... It seems I am completely borked. No sign of it anywhere... No idea what I was talking about.

Doesn't detract from my original point if you omit the battlefront/bobafett part.



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

oniyide on 21 June 2015
Normchacho said:
oniyide said:
it comes down to either you believe MS or not. And IMHO the way they handled the whole thing hell the way they have been handling things since the start of the gen, shady wording and outright lies. You cant blame people for not believing.

If they were really helping TR with development, why not say that when the game was OFFICIALLY announced, that makes no sense at all. So that leads me to believe that they arent helping with crap and its a bunch of BS, unless its marketing, that i could see.


They said they are helping "fund" the game, not develope it. Huge difference.

well hell, thats even worse. WTH does that even mean? More shady words



oniyide on 21 June 2015
Normchacho said:
oniyide said:
on another note why not just come out from the start and say TR would be on Xbox first? Just like Sony did with FF7remake


Because to this day there are some people who still think TR is an Xbox exclusive. That's why.


fair enough, i still think its a waste. At this point you get outright exclusivity(SF5) or you just leave it alone