By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Ok, we need to calm down about starfox's visuals

 

What do you think of the visuals?

Best of the series, still not impressive. 56 27.59%
 
Best of the series, but i... 71 34.98%
 
Not as good as Assault. 13 6.40%
 
Not as good as 64 3d. 13 6.40%
 
Not as good as Adventures. 6 2.96%
 
Zero graphix 44 21.67%
 
Total:203
Yooka said:
BasilZero said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:



Star Fox has always been a gameplay focused game but has always been noted in its greatest core gens as a very beautiful game to boot. Seems they didnt take that to heart this time.


Well good thing that visuals never affect whether I will purchase a game or not :)

The game would be a lot more fun if it had a lot of visual flair. The enemy design is boring as well.

Many things are also taken straight from Star Fox 64. This game should be delayed, Wii U is doomed already anyway.



That's why it wont be delayed as they don't want to spend anymore time and resources on Wii U when it could be going towards the NX.

Around the Network
Areym said:
Mystro-Sama said:
We need to clam down about Star Fox in general. The ain't all that.

Very much agreed. It's always been a B-tier Nintendo franchise and it will always be that way.

OT: The graphics are fairly bad for this day in age but as long as the game plays well and if it keeps running at 60fps, then it can be easily overlooked.


Not to mention the gameplay is seriously limited for today's standards.



Mystro-Sama said:


Not to mention the gameplay is seriously limited for today's standards.


Can you elaborate on what the heck that even means? Also I haven't see people making that big a deal out of Starfox, especially not after it's reveal.



They're ok, But since they need to drive 2 screens, I'm ok with them.



The level with the hovercraft looked like a miniature RC hovercraft through some kind of sewer and dropping a robot to turn a switch on/of is very bad and lame...



Around the Network
Areym said:
Mystro-Sama said:
We need to clam down about Star Fox in general. The ain't all that.

Very much agreed. It's always been a B-tier Nintendo franchise and it will always be that way.

Starfox on the SNES and 64 sure as hell weren't B-tier, they were AAA blockbusters for their time.



It seems that the visuals of the game shown on the E3 booth and on the Treehouse segment were way better than on the Digital Event trailer



curl-6 said:
Areym said:

Very much agreed. It's always been a B-tier Nintendo franchise and it will always be that way.

Starfox on the SNES and 64 sure as hell weren't B-tier, they were AAA blockbusters for their time.


The game was small though and only took an hour to beat, so it wasn't really Triple AAA (budget wise). The only game that actually took a while to beat out of star fox was Adventures, which wasn't a blockbuster like 64 was. I hope that for U they have at least a 10 hour campaign (one run through). I love replay but I just want an actual full star fox game where you can't beat levels in 8 minutes and there is only 10-15 levels...



Rogerioandrade said:
It seems that the visuals of the game shown on the E3 booth and on the Treehouse segment were way better than on the Digital Event trailer


They aren't.

Dulfite said:

The game was small though and only took an hour to beat, so it wasn't really Triple AAA (budget wise). The only game that actually took a while to beat out of star fox was Adventures, which wasn't a blockbuster like 64 was. I hope that for U they have at least a 10 hour campaign (one run through). I love replay but I just want an actual full star fox game where you can't beat levels in 8 minutes and there is only 10-15 levels...


64 has multiple paths and secrets, you can't experience them all in one run. That said I still was hoping this game would be much longer, but now that we know it's basically Starfox 64 I'm sure the length will be similar. I'm really starting to doubt if I should day one this game if it's $60 now.