By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - HoloLens' Project X-Ray delivers a first-person augmented reality shooter

When last I saw and wore the HoloLens it felt very much like a collection of hacked together tech. It was so fragile, I was told, that I couldn't touch the headset, and its self-contained computer was actually in a block of electronics hanging noisily around my neck.

In action, it was stunning, different than other forms of augmented and virtual reality I had seen.

Today, sitting down in Microsoft's second-floor, air-conditioned meeting rooms on the E3 show floor, I was reintroduced to the HoloLens, and it's grown up a lot.

Now the device is fully self-contained, with a computer powerful enough to run Windows 10 games and programs silently tucked away in a relatively sleek looking headset. The experience was no longer hands off and I no longer had to wear what the developers nicknamed the "Flavor Flav necklace" to power the unit.

It weighed very little and, once activated, created a high-definition image that seemed to float in space before my eyes, or lock onto walls or tables. The virtual screen was about the size of a deck of cards if you held it in front of your eyes with your arm half-extended. It sounds small, and in some cases, including once you first put it on, it looks small. But once you get into the experience of playing a game with it, the size issue seems to fade away.

Microsoft invited me into the makeshift office, a roughly 13-by-13-foot room complete with tiny couches, and paintings hanging on the walls, to give me a chance to play something they're calling Project X-Ray.

Project X-Ray isn't meant to be a prototype for an upcoming game, instead a spokesman described it to me as an "exploration for gaming in a mixed reality-environment. It's designed to explore what's possible when you have a device that's untethered from a computer. What gaming could look like on a HoloLens."

The game was fairly simple. Players put on the headset and hold an Xbox One controller in their hands. A targeting reticle is controlled by what you're looking at and you can fire a sort of rail-gun with the right trigger and activate an ability that lets you see enemies through walls and slow down time with the left trigger.

The object of the game is to survive an attack of bug-like aliens that are breaking through the real walls of the room you're in, by shooting them and avoiding their return fire and lasers.

You take damage in the game when a shot hits your head, but other than that one tweak, the game plays like a stripped down first-person shooter.

The game was a fun demo designed to show off the capabilities of the HoloLens. The targeting reticle was a floating circle with a split outer ring that showed my armor level and how charged my special ability was. Floating arrows indicated where the enemies were.

Quickly into the game play I found myself ducking and dodging to avoid incoming fire from the aliens I hadn't killed immediately. It wasn't the sort of game one could play in a den with a coffee table or dogs nearby, but because it was augmented reality, had there been things in the way, I could have simply avoided them.

The bugs would break through the wall, leaving behind a hole that showed the faked inner structure of the office. Sometimes I saw wood framing, or brick, sometimes I could see deeper into the wall. It was a neat effect.

The game felt like the sort that shipped with the Wii, back when Nintendo was initially trying to train people on how to use their new technology. While the developers said this was just to show of the HoloLens' possibilities, it certainly looked like the sort of demo that might ship with the still unpriced, undated heaadset.

http://www.polygon.com/e3-2015/2015/6/16/8791473/hololens-project-x-ray-delivers-a-first-person-augmented-reality







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
Around the Network
pbroy said:

 the size issue seems to fade away.

when you fall in love, these type of things are easy to overcome.







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence

Yeah no. Good for a one time party gag but to really create some immersive experiences you have to go VR.
Nothing against Hololense but when it comes to gaming AR will always be the inferior gimmicky little brother of VR.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
Yeah no. Good for a one time party gag but to really create some immersive experiences you have to go VR.
Nothing against Hololense but what gaming is concerned AR will always be the inferior gimmicky little brother of VR.


yeah pretty much. 

 

imagine every game you ever play uses the same theme/art/assets/level.  how boring.  now imagine that the theme/art/assets/level is your living room coffee table.   even more boring.

i'm excited for hololens tech,.. really i am.  but i'm excited for the productivity apps like navigation not games.  games will just be sooo much better in VR where the developers creates the entire world not just a small piece of it.



But you can run around in your room and actually not bump into things. I understand with the obesity of most Americans, it might be hard, but still.

Imagine a horror game, where you try to hide from a little doll that is trying to kill you. Maybe a game where zombies are breaking in your house and you need to fend them off. Or a rape game, where people are in your house trying to rape you and you need to run around and hide from them. Imagine a real life Sims game, where you have an imaginary wife and she is cooking for you in the kitchen and watching movies with you on your couch and when you go to bed, she is right there beside you, telling you how awesome you are and you are the best lover ever.







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
Around the Network

There is some potential here. The Halo 5 hololens demo looked good, but its limitation to simply mission briefing isn't going to cut it in delivering a worhwhile experiece. It needs to be linked to the gameplay and enhance it. 

vivster said:

Yeah no. Good for a one time party gag but to really create some immersive experiences you have to go VR.
Nothing against Hololense but when it comes to gaming AR will always be the inferior gimmicky little brother of VR.


Claims AR is a gimmick. Hails VR. 



Imagine the holo lens with No Man's Sky projected on an empty room. :O



pbroy said:
But you can run around in your room and actually not bump into things. I understand with the obesity of most Americans, it might be hard, but still.

Imagine a horror game, where you try to hide from a little doll that is trying to kill you. Maybe a game where zombies are breaking in your house and you need to fend them off. Or a rape game, where people are in your house trying to rape you and you need to run around and hide from them. Imagine a real life Sims game, where you have an imaginary wife and she is cooking for you in the kitchen and watching movies with you on your couch and when you go to bed, she is right there beside you, telling you how awesome you are and you are the best lover ever.

All these scenarios would be a lot more immersive in a simulated environment. You don't even need top notch graphics to make it seem real. The brain will make it feel so real that there is no need for real environments.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Seems to confirm that Hololens will find it's place as wearable tech mostly outside of the home gaming space. I love the idea of Hololens being used in gaming arenas like laserstrike where you have purpose built physical obstacles, objects and enemies, as well as virtual objects and enemies. It would also make for freaking pants shitting nightmare inducing House of Horrors attractions. The applications are endless, aside from in home solo core gaming.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

vivster said:
pbroy said:
But you can run around in your room and actually not bump into things. I understand with the obesity of most Americans, it might be hard, but still.

Imagine a horror game, where you try to hide from a little doll that is trying to kill you. Maybe a game where zombies are breaking in your house and you need to fend them off. Or a rape game, where people are in your house trying to rape you and you need to run around and hide from them. Imagine a real life Sims game, where you have an imaginary wife and she is cooking for you in the kitchen and watching movies with you on your couch and when you go to bed, she is right there beside you, telling you how awesome you are and you are the best lover ever.

All these scenarios would be a lot more immersive in a simulated environment. You don't even need top notch graphics to make it seem real. The brain will make it feel so real that there is no need for real environments.


But when I'm having sex with my imaginary wife I want to be naked and having sex with the air on the bed. I might fall off the bed if I was doing that in VR.







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence