S.T.A.G.E. said:
plaintruth said:
Because most third parties are unprofessional, either getting paid to skip nintendo platforms or skipping then out of stupidity.
Anyone saying that wii u can't handle the games or that they don't sell is just another stupid hater.
The wii u proved more than once how far from ps360 it is in specs capabilities, putting it in the same range as ps4/x1, but with less raw power.
The games sell, plenty of titles are getting 300-500k+ sales, and no amount of cherrypicking will change that. the big multiplatforms that idiots keep mentioning as having low sales(AC, COD, batman) were released when the installed base was like 3x smaller than it is now/will be in the next few months and those games STILL SOLD DECENTLY. 200-300k is surely enough to make a profit and with the bigger current installed base they would easily get 500k+.
|
1.300k -500k is not profitable for larger western games. Perhaps in the 90's not now. AAA games (most of the time) need over a million in sales.
2. If what you said was true about people hating on Nintendo, third party would not be cutting the chord on last gen consoles either. They've been telling people they needed specs higher than what Nintendo offered since 2011 (or possibly earlier).
3. The Wii U is not far from the 360 and PS3 in specs capabilities.
In reality its just Nintendo doing what they've always done which is not listening.
|
1. You heard it first here guys. s.t.a.g.e thinks ports need to sell 1 million to be profitable.
2. What does last gen have to do with the conversation? at least try to make a minimum of sense.
3. Yes it is. standard 720p 60fps + much better graphics than ps360 vs standard 540p 30fps on ps360.
In reality it's just Nintendo doing things right and competitors ilegally bribing 3rd parties to skip nintendo.
Zero alt obliterated -RavenXtra