By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which is a Better Platform?

 

Which one is better for you?

Platform 1 31 23.31%
 
Platform 2 102 76.69%
 
Total:133
daredevil.shark said:
green_sky said:

Fewer better games. 


Fewer and fewer. Less than 12-15 games in a year is a farcry. No matter what people want variety.

I don't know why you quoted me. The OP asked a question and i answered it. I would have gone with variety average games when i was a teen and had infinite time. Am hardly able to keep up with the platforms i have now with backlogs on each one of them. I could stop buying games now and i'd be good for at least two years minimum, if not much more. 

Again not sure why you quoted me. Cheers. 



Around the Network
green_sky said:


To support your point.



daredevil.shark said:
green_sky said:

To support your point.

Alright then. 



Platform 2 because I don't play that many games. 



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

#2 for me... I like to get select few games and play them for a long time usually



NintenDomination [May 2015 - July 2017]
 

  - Official  VGChartz Tutorial Thread - 

NintenDomination [2015/05/19 - 2017/07/02]
 

          

 

 

Here lies the hidden threads. 

 | |

Nintendo Metascore | Official NintenDomination | VGC Tutorial Thread

| Best and Worst of Miiverse | Manga Discussion Thead |
[3DS] Winter Playtimes [Wii U]

Around the Network

This is quality vs quantity. It is like two kinds of people where they go to a restaurant and one prefers more food for less money and less quality, or less food for more money but more quality. People who actually enjoy food prefer taste over quantity, people who actually enjoy gaming, prefer a few but great games to a large library of shovelware.



Number 2. It only has five less games with five more must own titles than the other.



gamingpotato7 said:
This is quality vs quantity. It is like two kinds of people where they go to a restaurant and one prefers more food for less money and less quality, or less food for more money but more quality. People who actually enjoy food prefer taste over quantity, people who actually enjoy gaming, prefer a few but great games to a large library of shovelware.


Black and white with no shades of grey.

This reasoning can make sense as long as these platforms have a comparable amount of games, but in my opinion it's not reasonable anymore if, for instance, platform 2 had 10 great and 10 good games, while platform 1 had 5 great and one hundred good games (over the course of 6-7 years).

If quality vs quantity was all that matters and we just say we prefer quality, we would be better off owning a platform with only one game worth 100% and we would ignore a platform that has 1000+ 89% games.

There's no doubt that quality matters as well. How much it matters is up to personal preferences.

I know I prefer a good restaurant where I can have a lot of different and good stuff for 20-30 euro over a restaurant where they only serve the best 1oz of tenderloin I've ever tasted for approximately the same price. I'd still be hungry.



id go option 3

platform with 1 game with a score of 100%and no other games made for it lol.


so option 2 it is.



 

 

Platform 2. Only 5 less games total, but 5 more excellent games than platform 1.