By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS4 Dominates Ubisoft's Sales in Fiscal Year 2014/15, Xbox One Follows

DonFerrari said:
kinisking said:

Totally did my math wrong lol for the ubisoft games xD. Just guessed for the hw so the ten percent difference difference doesn't shock me. There is no narrative, the truth if the matter is that it can hardly be called domination when ps4 has a higher install base, and the fan base is supposed to like these type of games more. 

Ok, them I'm sorry about jumping the gun. The domination is about total sales, not percentage, although x1 numbers are quite healthy.

That makes more sense, and is something I can agree on 



Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out

Ps4:110million

Xbox one :75 million( was 65) 

Wii u: 20 milliion

Around the Network
Azerth said:
ps4 dominated but x1 saw a bigger increase


The XBO being bundled with two Ubisoft games (ACU+AC:BF) would explain that...



No surprises here. The PS4 is the lead product currently, and will continue to be.



 

              

Dance my pretties!

The Official Art Thread      -      The Official Manga Thread      -      The Official Starbound Thread

kinisking said:
How is that domination? Doing about 33 percent better that what the x1 is doing when the ps4 has sold like 70 percent more isn't that great. Especially when most of their games aren't fps, therefore according to a lot of people's logic shouldn't be selling well on xbix

That's true but it's also true that MS made a lot of AC bundles (unity and AC4) so even if xbox one sells poorly, the one that benefit the most from that bundle is Ubisoft and also explain why there isn't a bigger lead. 



Angelv577 said:
kinisking said:
How is that domination? Doing about 33 percent better that what the x1 is doing when the ps4 has sold like 70 percent more isn't that great. Especially when most of their games aren't fps, therefore according to a lot of people's logic shouldn't be selling well on xbix

That's true but it's also true that MS made a lot of AC bundles (unity and AC4) so even if xbox one sells poorly, the one that benefit the most from that bundle is Ubisoft and also explain why there isn't a bigger lead. 

Didn't take that into account :o, yeah then ps4 is dominating xD



Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out

Ps4:110million

Xbox one :75 million( was 65) 

Wii u: 20 milliion

Around the Network
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Ubisoft quality by platform have no relation on top selling. They deliver bad games and glitch fest in all, also gave prefference to x1 against ps4 on ac unity, delivering a better framerate on X1 but not best graphical quality on ps4.

If you know they are bad then why look at them as good news at all when they have a abd track record, it;s no different from cheering or seeing benefits from an oiol company who's known to be shite and disgreards everything around them.

Their problems are deeper. And you should prioritize were your Money come. When a customer provide you 3x more revenue than the others who would you prioritize with no hypocrazi?

Not really, PC users avoided the past few years of ubi releases because Ubisoft's craftsmanship was shown to be bad and the port reports and data proves this, but ubisoft like to ignore that they have done bad along with not improving their PC specific DRM client Uplay compared to the likes of Steam, Origin and now GoG galaxy, by all means you can see 3x rofit as a good thing but that doesn't say anything about their quality and how well they are doing vs those who are outputting at a better quality rate.

(Also what does hypocrazi mean?).

Also deving for only one platform could improve quality assurance. Besides that I don't think Ubisoft would do exclusives, even for WiiU they ended releasing wd Besides all.

Not really because last time I checked we had threads and other sites full of people claiming Sunset Overdrive would look better on PS4, by your logic Xbox one can't do a better job by having it exclusive to it's platform and then there's PC, besides there have been other multiplatform games in the past made by others that have looked great on their respective platforms so it;s really just down to both ubisoft and the hardware.




I'm not looking at Ubisoft, but support in general. I haven't bought from Ubisoft in years.

 

What PC ignoring Ubisoft denies my claim that ubi and any other company will and should focus on the money making customer??? And who would you sell to the bigger customer or the smaller one that boycot you?

 

By what logic? My logic is that single platform can be less buggy than MP. And it is obvious that being on ps4 instead of x1 would make the game able to use more power. As well as dev in top end PC would. But bug and graphical prowess are different things.

 

But what are you arguing? You complained about the concentration and them go to complain they are rubbish anyway.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

 


I'm not looking at Ubisoft, but support in general. I haven't bought from Ubisoft in years.

But you're using Ubisoft as that example by saying they will benefit PS4 users because they somehow sold more on PS4...

What PC ignoring Ubisoft denies my claim that ubi and any other company will and should focus on the money making customer??? And who would you sell to the bigger customer or the smaller one that boycot you?

I want to reply to this but I can't because your english isn't that good in what you're trying explain to me.

By what logic? My logic is that single platform can be less buggy than MP. And it is obvious that being on ps4 instead of x1 would make the game able to use more power. As well as dev in top end PC would. But bug and graphical prowess are different things.

But what benefit would that be to you if it were on PC or XB1 then?.

But what are you arguing? You complained about the concentration and them go to complain they are rubbish anyway.

I'm arguing from your original point where you said "Seems like ps4 marketshare is showing its powers and may generate additional benefits to users." to which it;s just people buying ubisoft games, that's not really power and compared to the other platforms Ubisoft sold to which had plenty of issues, if ubisoft had just made their games perfect if not in a proper stable order on the other platforms then you wouldn't be seeing this.

It's not that I'm complaining (apparently disagreeing means complaining on here?), it's that people are spinning this as a good thing for one platform while forgetting the other 3 got more or elss fucked over by ubisoft, but no one on here is going to bother with that side anyway because numbers rather than quality and care.





Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:


I'm not looking at Ubisoft, but support in general. I haven't bought from Ubisoft in years.

But you're using Ubisoft as that example by saying they will benefit PS4 users because they somehow sold more on PS4...

What PC ignoring Ubisoft denies my claim that ubi and any other company will and should focus on the money making customer??? And who would you sell to the bigger customer or the smaller one that boycot you?

I want to reply to this but I can't because your english isn't that good in what you're trying explain to me.

By what logic? My logic is that single platform can be less buggy than MP. And it is obvious that being on ps4 instead of x1 would make the game able to use more power. As well as dev in top end PC would. But bug and graphical prowess are different things.

But what benefit would that be to you if it were on PC or XB1 then?.

But what are you arguing? You complained about the concentration and them go to complain they are rubbish anyway.

I'm arguing from your original point where you said "Seems like ps4 marketshare is showing its powers and may generate additional benefits to users." to which it;s just people buying ubisoft games, that's not really power and compared to the other platforms Ubisoft sold to which had plenty of issues, if ubisoft had just made their games perfect if not in a proper stable order on the other platforms then you wouldn't be seeing this.

It's not that I'm complaining (apparently disagreeing means complaining on here?), it's that people are spinning this as a good thing for one platform while forgetting the other 3 got more or elss fucked over by ubisoft, but no one on here is going to bother with that side anyway because numbers rather than quality and care.



I'm using Ubisoft as an example that PS4 is selling strong in SW because that is the number we have and it certainly is expected to be similar on other publishers... have any number that denies that?

I said that a company that sells more to a type of customer will focus on it more... and you started talking about why other customers avoid them, but that won't even start to cover why shouldn't Ubi focus more on PS4 and X1 than other platforms since that is were they get more money.

Being on X1 wouldn't make the game better graphically so I don't know what you are putting in here, and actually this particular game were only released on X1 so whatever I lost was already lost... and since I buy whatever system have the game I want it launching on just one platform but being better game would benefit me anyway, if I wanted the game I would just buy the system.

So my point that if Sony platform sells better then we can get more benefits on newer games is that if the games were better in other system they would sell more there??? Is that supposed to say Ubisoft should release better games for the systems with less potencial to sell? Or are you saying that X1 and PC gamers don't buy Ubisoft games because they are bad, but PS4 buys it for some reason?

You have been going for quite sometime complaining at all opportunities about Sony having 50% marketshare and how that is bad... you are always talking the same tune that no one is interested in talking besides you... PS2 era was fantastic in all systems so still you are just sprouting nosense.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

 

You have been going for quite sometime complaining at all opportunities about Sony having 50% marketshare and how that is bad... you are always talking the same tune that no one is interested in talking besides you... PS2 era was fantastic in all systems so still you are just sprouting nosense.


You know I just realised I'm not going to bother with the rest, no because you think hands down that Sony having more marketshare than Wii U and XB1 is for the better and best and I'm sorry but you're just wrong and I'll leave it there since I had this discussion with someone last time and they just didn't see where they went wrong but assumed I was because I simply didn't see their way in thinking someone being dominant over the rest somehow means good things for those dominated, except it doesn't at all.

But thanks for telling me I was spouting nonsense, I'm glad we kept this so civil up until now and yall once again proved my point.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

You have been going for quite sometime complaining at all opportunities about Sony having 50% marketshare and how that is bad... you are always talking the same tune that no one is interested in talking besides you... PS2 era was fantastic in all systems so still you are just sprouting nosense.


You know I just realised I'm not going to bother with the rest, no because you think hands down that Sony having more marketshare than Wii U and XB1 is for the better and best and I'm sorry but you're just wrong and I'll leave it there since I had this discussion with someone last time and they just didn't see where they went wrong but assumed I was because I simply didn't see their way in thinking someone being dominant over the rest somehow means good things for those dominated, except it doesn't at all.

But thanks for telling me I was spouting nonsense, I'm glad we kept this so civil up until now and yall once again proved my point.


Yep, you have been entering some threads related to Sony marketshare and complained about it. have a nice day about how much it affects you without being able to provide a single example of how bad was sony dominating PS2 era, and don't come with PS3 because they lost more money on that than anyone else.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."