While at the same time displaying little to no benefits for any other platform along with worse off versions and reaching that self fulfilling prophecy.

Ps4 is selling 60% more (32% versus 20%) while hw is like 80% more (22m vs 12m) . But we all know attach ratios get lower the bigger the install base (more casuals with less dedication) and that usa have bigger attach ratio than other countries and ps4 only have a 15% advantage. Both diminish ps4 overall attach ratio, but don't let facts get in the way of your narrative.

Dunno how they can "improve" their game when PC isn't owned by a company and it's actually up to ubisoft to make the game the best on all platforms but we've already seen enough of unity and WD to know they aren't in the right mindset for that, but of course who cares about quality?.

See I see this "getting exclusive benefits" and shunning the others as very bad form, especially for a multiplat dev/pub, you want as much money and users as you can so you're better off appealing to all the platforms instead of just appealing to one because by the time you've had your money from one and screwed the others over, they certainly won't be there for you.

The way it should be working is them making the game great on the platforms they sell to, including PC rather than it being a dysmall mess and they certainly don't have a squeaky clean record.

Totally did my math wrong lol for the ubisoft games xD. Just guessed for the hw so the ten percent difference difference doesn't shock me. There is no narrative, the truth if the matter is that it can hardly be called domination when ps4 has a higher install base, and the fan base is supposed to like these type of games more. 

Ubisoft quality by platform have no relation on top selling. They deliver bad games and glitch fest in all, also gave prefference to x1 against ps4 on ac unity, delivering a better framerate on X1 but not best graphical quality on ps4.

If you know they are bad then why look at them as good news at all when they have a abd track record, it;s no different from cheering or seeing benefits from an oiol company who's known to be shite and disgreards everything around them.

Their problems are deeper. And you should prioritize were your Money come. When a customer provide you 3x more revenue than the others who would you prioritize with no hypocrazi?

Not really, PC users avoided the past few years of ubi releases because Ubisoft's craftsmanship was shown to be bad and the port reports and data proves this, but ubisoft like to ignore that they have done bad along with not improving their PC specific DRM client Uplay compared to the likes of Steam, Origin and now GoG galaxy, by all means you can see 3x rofit as a good thing but that doesn't say anything about their quality and how well they are doing vs those who are outputting at a better quality rate.

(Also what does hypocrazi mean?).

Also deving for only one platform could improve quality assurance. Besides that I don't think Ubisoft would do exclusives, even for WiiU they ended releasing wd Besides all.

Not really because last time I checked we had threads and other sites full of people claiming Sunset Overdrive would look better on PS4, by your logic Xbox one can't do a better job by having it exclusive to it's platform and then there's PC, besides there have been other multiplatform games in the past made by others that have looked great on their respective platforms so it;s really just down to both ubisoft and the hardware.