Chazore said:
|
I'm using Ubisoft as an example that PS4 is selling strong in SW because that is the number we have and it certainly is expected to be similar on other publishers... have any number that denies that?
I said that a company that sells more to a type of customer will focus on it more... and you started talking about why other customers avoid them, but that won't even start to cover why shouldn't Ubi focus more on PS4 and X1 than other platforms since that is were they get more money.
Being on X1 wouldn't make the game better graphically so I don't know what you are putting in here, and actually this particular game were only released on X1 so whatever I lost was already lost... and since I buy whatever system have the game I want it launching on just one platform but being better game would benefit me anyway, if I wanted the game I would just buy the system.
So my point that if Sony platform sells better then we can get more benefits on newer games is that if the games were better in other system they would sell more there??? Is that supposed to say Ubisoft should release better games for the systems with less potencial to sell? Or are you saying that X1 and PC gamers don't buy Ubisoft games because they are bad, but PS4 buys it for some reason?
You have been going for quite sometime complaining at all opportunities about Sony having 50% marketshare and how that is bad... you are always talking the same tune that no one is interested in talking besides you... PS2 era was fantastic in all systems so still you are just sprouting nosense.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







