By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Stocks: Electronic Arts vs Nintendo since E3 2011 and the "Unprecedented Partnership"...

RolStoppable said:
Train wreck said:

Yes, because Vita means life.

That's not the kind of answer that someone who is interested in a discussion would give.

He ignored my two posts which tells me all I need to know tbh.



Around the Network
Smear-Gel said:
I like this thread.

We can't listen to your avatar! :p



kowenicki said:

There is no correlation.

EA stock didn't rise because they didn't support WiiU and 3DS.

I dont know why you would come to that conclusion.... though I can hazard a guess.


Ya, sorry but that guess is obvious based on history. Also since you did ask, Sony vs EA is roughly the same about Nintendo vs EA, Sony does better, but the relationship was about the same until recently.



 

Samus Aran said:
RolStoppable said:

That's not the kind of answer that someone who is interested in a discussion would give.

He ignored my two posts which tells me all I need to know tbh.

If I wanted to do the work in showing that EA and Nintendo have an inverse relationship when it comes to stock price using statistical analysis SPSS, SAS, R etc...I 'm sure could...but ill just chalk EA reneging on its "Unprecedence Partnership" with Nintendo and its recent success as coincidental.  Maybe they shifted what little resources they invested in them, and all underperforming platforms since the start of gen 8 into better opportunity and its working out for them.



Based on the data and the responses the OP has offered so far, I don't think the intent of this thread was to have an open discussion about whether EA's business move to avoid Nintendo was a good one or not.

Going to lock this thread, and if the true aim was an open discussion then I encourage the OP to remake it with a better framed OP with more sufficient data to back up their argument rather than seemingly putting two puzzle pieces together that don't fit.