I'm taking the negative position. That means anyone who wants to defend the claim "God exists" needs to offer some supporting arguments.

I'll entertain the commonly refuted arguments if I feel like it, but it's likely they'll be largely ignored due to the fact that they are easily swatted by a cursory search on the internet. It isn't because I can't, and it isn't because I find you to be stupid. 

Rules:

1. You get 3 strikes. If I cite 3 fallacies in your arguments, you're done, you've demonstrated utter incompetence. Please leave. This will prevent rapid-fire, haphazardly-assembled replies.  

2. In order to have a meaningful debate, we need to agree on a shared view of epistemology - in this case, we'll simply consider Rationalism (that is to say that we'll use logic to test the veracity of claims)

3. Please attempt to formulate your arguments into propositional form. If you can't, it's likely I'll present them back to you in such a form along with a rebuttal to this assembly as I perceive it. I can be wrong in my construction and you must correct me if this is the case.

4. This really should be resolved by 1 but on the off-chance that it isn't obvious, leave the insults at the door. 

Welcome & Good Luck!

Seriously though, this will end in locks, bans, or both. Better to abort now.

This is going to end so fucking badly.

I just want to be "INB4" the lock.

There is only one true goddess and her name is Haruhi!!!!!

This is the worst idea ever.

How do they get the caramel in the Caramilk bar then? Hmmm?
3 STRIKES YOU'RE OUT

Please remember when arguing the existence of something, the burden of proof is on the person to prove that it actually exsists. One logical fallacy in these arguments is to ask someone to prove that God doesn't exist when you haven't proved that he does.

Carry on.

where's michael jackson and his popcorn when you need him

Ooh I found something you can't solve!!!:

You can't solve it because you don't believe in higher powers! CHECKMATE ATHEISTS