By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - WHY have I not seen any #CrashforSmash? Or even Spyro?

I would love to see Crash and Spyro in SSB



#1 Amb-ass-ador

Around the Network

Because....Sony All Stars is where those should go.

Maybe not Spyro.....but the Skylander CEO has not opened his//her mouth yet, like Phil and the banjo phenomenon.



It's a relevant character in the history of videogames, but Crash never did anything for Nintendo systems/Nintendo fans. I'd rather have an actual character relevant to Nintendo systems.



Because it makes no sense. I voted for Bayonetta :)



Activision owns them.



Around the Network

What would putting your competitors past/current mascots into your fighting game gain you?, because I can't see Nintendo gaining anything other than royalties to pay, that's the opposite of a benefit.

Also not including the "free publicity/free sales" let's not make a promise you don't have the data to provide nor keep.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

If you had asked me 10 years ago, I'd be happy about it. Nowadays Crash and Spyro make me sad.



Yep.

Recycle001 said:
While I think Crash would fit really well into Smash, I would much rather see other characters. I also think Crash is very overrated and was never really as popular as people think he was. There's a reason Nintendo let Rare go.

Geno for Smash4!


How is Rare related to Crash? Or am I missing the point? sorry lol.



That would be weird, he'd be more suited for ps all stars



Because those are horrible characters.