5/5

http://www.stuff.tv/in/bloodborne/review

5/5

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/25/game_theory_review_bloodborne/?page=1

5/5

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/video-game-review-bloodborne-article-1.2163017

90/100

http://ageofgeeks.com/games/bloodborne-review/

95/10

http://www.shanethegamer.com/page/bloodborne-review/

According to PSNProfiles, 2 people have platinumed the game already. I guess they got the game early but still that is fucking insane

I feel the game is harder than Dark Souls as you don't have a shield and everything is based on offence and moving around.

It's getting boring :D

I'm still waiting for my Collector's Edition, not before the 31st :(

And the lowest scores it's got are 8/10, which are still excellent scores. TOMORROW.

They did. One of them took 1 week and 9 hours to get it, the other guy took 5 days and 18 hours to platinum it.

Still that's some serious dedication

Don't worry, there's another Perfect Score which went to MetaCritic few minutes ago :

5/5 from digitallydownloaded :

''The combat is a touch more accessible than the Souls games, being much more focused on aggression and losing a touch of subtlety in the process. Player's defensive options are limited - there's a duck and roll, but the shields that formed such a core part of the strategy of each Souls game is replaced by the expectation that you'd be wielding weapons in both hands. Taking things one step further, if an enemy lands a hit on your character, you've got a short amount of time to hit it back to recover some health.

This system works, in that I did indeed find myself far, far more aggressive than I was in the Souls games. At the same time this made combat my least favourite part of the game, because I loved the tacitcal dance that was a Souls battle, and I found that Bloodborne's combat was limited and scrappy by comparison. I'm certain other people will appreciate Bloodborne for that reason, but I wouldn't be doing my job as a critic if I didn't highlight a potentially problematic area for some.

Combat aside, Bloodborne is a visionary work by a visionary artist. Intense in both theme and application, it's a gory concession to the tastes of the modern mainstream player, while maintaining the spirit and uncompromising narrative that was the hallmark of the Souls games at their finest. But this is far more consistent in that application than those games, making it From Software's finest work to date.''

http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/2015/03/review-bloodborne-sony-playstation-4.html

happy to see this game still getting perfect scores, cant wait for the IGN and Polygon reviews so we can see the definitive score

Then the game would aleady be at 95.

But it's metacritics, it's not reliable because it take only a little part of Us review.

Some french review for the game :

jeuxvideo.com : 18/20

Gamekult.fr : 8+/10

Gameblog.fr : 4.5/5