Kowan said:
|
The combat, yes. They attacked the general flow of progression and mission structure
Kowan said:
|
The combat, yes. They attacked the general flow of progression and mission structure
Kowan said: The OP needs to be outdated as well as the headline. The 67 score is long gone and will not be going back anymore. |
deleted. did not need to be said.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
tokilamockingbrd said:
deleted. did not need to be said. |
What's deleted?
Kowan said:
|
A made a comment about why the OP has not changed the subject. It was a pointless post so I removed it.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
teigaga said:
The combat, yes. They attacked the general flow of progression and mission structure |
I guess you were wrong afterall. You proclaimed "Called it" when it was at 65, so now it is a very solid 76 did you call that too?
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
Wagram said: What's the 67-76 thing? Seems quite irrelevant. |
Apparantly it can go no higher than 76 (which it is at) but we can expect it to drop as low as 67... lol. Each time the meta average goes up OP keeps the old score and just extends the range. Must be hanging on to hope it comes back down into the 60 range.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
Most of the complaints were targeted towards the technical aspect (which is understandable considering it's a port) and the mission structure, but mostly everyone praised the combat system which is good enough for me. Though I agree it should have been priced at $40 or even $50. Luckily I can get it at that price at Best Buy.
tokilamockingbrd said:
I guess you were wrong afterall. You proclaimed "Called it" when it was at 65, so now it is a very solid 76 did you call that too? |
Well my actual expectation was that it would get below 75, still wrong but not by as big a margin