I don't fulfill any of these requirements, but I have a lot of muscles. I can protect him.

That plan could backfire ya know.

It's worth a try though, isn't it? ^^

Stealth? See this is the problem right here. The developers had confirmed months ago it would have paid airdrops with supplies. It was only criticized by uneducated people. Now next time you want to attack Sony fans make sure you do at least five seconds of research so you can attack them for something legitimate. 

Rol is a Genius, this thread already shows who we should keep tbone away from debating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_Dxnc0CoZQ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H1Z1#Controversy

http://www.vgchartz.com/article/252827/sonys-h1z1-faced-with-problems-offers-refunds/

Sony claimed just a few days before release that there won't be no P2W, i.e. they lied. I find it amusing that you think I made this up and that my plan was to attack Sony fans (while actually Kerotan was the one who took this very thread as opportunity to claim that Nintendo fans are unable to critisise Nintendo for - quote - "their many recent mistakes", and I just countered him with the H1Z1 example, because if there's one, only one thing I can't stand on a gaming forum, it's Sony fans accusing fans of other companies of blind love.).

I nominate myself. Along with Pavolink and Spurge.

What could be a better team?

Well, I sent him a private message last time, but it didn't help...

Even an army of psychologists couldn't stop him if someone who doesn't play Nintendo games attacks Nintendo with poor stereotypical arguments.

That's like a unbearable personal offense for him.

I don't want to remember tbone51 as a user on life support. A user whose contributions depended on constant hand holding and forced censorship.

I want to remember him as tbone51. If that means a perma-ban is imminent, then so be it.

One guy slipped up in one livestream and passed along incorrect information. Meanwhile John Smedley has said many many times that the game will have paid airdrops. It was said dozens of times in other livestreams, as well as being quoted constantly in articles and interviews. They were never hiding this information A simple Google search would be enough for people to have figured this out before they bought the game. Meanwhile you had to go out of your way to find one quote to discredit them. Do you see the difference? And Sony even offered a no questions asked refund for people who bought the game and were unaware of the microtransactions so people unhappy got their money back anyways. 

Again, what is the issue here?