By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Was Bayonetta 2 Nintendo's answer to God Of War?

 

?

Yes 39 14.83%
 
No 168 63.88%
 
Maybe 56 21.29%
 
Total:263
Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 18 January 2015

Nahh, they just wanted to show their "commitment" to having a more mature audience



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
freebs2 on 18 January 2015
mophinz said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Bayoneta 2 was funded because nintendo wanted to prove the WiiU was going to be more dedicated to the hardcore audience than the Wii.

by ruining a potential of such a great game with shitty hardware?

Yes, all reviewers have agreed on this. If this games had been released on Ps4 they wouldn't have ruined the cinematic feel with shitty 60fps.



GTAexpert on 18 January 2015
WhiteEaglePL said:
No because it's Platinums best thing.

Also, Bayonetta > God of War. GoW doesn't even appeal to me since it's over-blooded and mythology. Bayonetta appealed to me every since I saw it in 2013.

Well just because it doesn't appeal to you doesn't make it worse. Pretty much no PS exclusive appeals to you, doesn't make them bad games.



mophinz on 18 January 2015
Skullwaker said:
mophinz said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Bayoneta 2 was funded because nintendo wanted to prove the WiiU was going to be more dedicated to the hardcore audience than the Wii.

by ruining a potential of such a great game with shitty hardware?

Because great games HAVE to have groundbreaking graphics.

Also, this game wouldn't have existed without Nintendo, so they didn't "ruin" anything.

i didnt even mention graphics. the frame rate barely keep up 45fps for whole game 

and more cpu power or ram could give you more enemy count on screen or add more gameplay mechanic to it.



mine on 18 January 2015
mophinz said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Bayoneta 2 was funded because nintendo wanted to prove the WiiU was going to be more dedicated to the hardcore audience than the Wii.

by ruining a potential of such a great game with shitty hardware?


LOL.

Bayonetta was mediocre at best if compared to Bayonetta 2.

Everyone can tell if Nintendo is overviewing or funding a project.

Nothing comes close to Nintendos polish on gameplay and overall product quality.



Around the Network
mophinz on 18 January 2015
freebs2 said:
mophinz said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Bayoneta 2 was funded because nintendo wanted to prove the WiiU was going to be more dedicated to the hardcore audience than the Wii.

by ruining a potential of such a great game with shitty hardware?

Yes, all reviewers have agreed on this. If this games had been released on Ps4 they wouldn't have ruined the cinematic feel with shitty 60fps.


i'm talking about potential  of the game. not the game as it is right now. yes it was great but with better hardware or maybe  with a pc version the game could have done more than that. the game heavily limit by hardware and i didnt run at 60fps for most part of the game it's 45fps. and to be fair if the game was on Ps4 with this last gen graphic it could run at 60fps lock 



WhiteEaglePL on 18 January 2015
mine said:
mophinz said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Bayoneta 2 was funded because nintendo wanted to prove the WiiU was going to be more dedicated to the hardcore audience than the Wii.

by ruining a potential of such a great game with shitty hardware?


LOL.

Bayonetta was mediocre at best if compared to Bayonetta 2.

Everyone can tell if Nintendo is overviewing or funding a project.

Nothing comes close to Nintendos polish on gameplay and overall product quality.


Sorry but Both Bayonetta's are a 10/10 in my book, with B2 slightly higher due to online and better save system.



mine on 18 January 2015
mophinz said:


i'm talking about potential  of the game. not the game as it is right now. yes it was great but with better hardware or maybe  with a pc version the game could have done more than that. the game heavily limit by hardware and i didnt run at 60fps for most part of the game it's 45fps. and to be fair if the game was on Ps4 with this last gen graphic it could run at 60fps lock 

I can tell you what would have happend if anybody else then Nintendo would have funded the game: MORE cut scenes. LESS focused gameplay. MORE distracting minigames. LESS quality and polished gameplay.

Get it: Nintendo was the best thing which could possibly happen to Bayonetta 2.



Skullwaker on 18 January 2015
mophinz said:
i didnt even mention graphics. the frame rate barely keep up 45fps for whole game 

and more cpu power or ram could give you more enemy count on screen or add more gameplay mechanic to it.

Your point is automatically moot because this game would not have been made without Nintendo, so you can't say it's ruining the potential of something that wouldn't have existed. The game doesn't "barely keep up with 45fps for the whole game." Have you even played it?

Also, clearly the critics (along with everyone else that played the game) disagree with you. 



Official Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE Thread

                                      

S.T.A.G.E. on 18 January 2015

No. Not at all. Not even slightly. Nintendo did this just to appeal to an outside audience because western third party arent as attainable as the Japanese.