By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - AMD cards age better than Nvidia.

Consoles are definitely helping AMD out on the performance front ...



Around the Network
Protendo said:

I honestly think that AMD has done a fantastic job with drivers in the past 6 months. I have noticed some huge gains in certain games. I'm so happy their driver support has improved. That being said I might jump to the Nvidia side this time if AMD's new cards are far away.

I currently use Nvidia for my WOW machine and AMD for everything else right now.

It has to be more than just drivers though.  Drivers don't account for making up a 30% lead in performance!  Here's how I see it:

Nvidia: Puts all effort into building a card that performs well in TODAY's games and perfect Day 1 drivers.  That means they will sacrifice some resources on things that will help a ton in the future if it means better things on release.

AMD: Puts effort into building the strongest card possible while taking into account what games will use in the future.  For example the HD 5000 series had DX11 way before Nvidia did even though it wasn't used a lot until a year after the 5870's release, and the 7970 had 3GB of VRAM when most games didn't use it.  However look at the effects now the 7970 has almost caught up to the Titan.

 

I could see benifits to either system, but honestly it would be better if both were true.  Howver it does seem like day 1 drivers from AMD match Nvidia's these days so maybe both have come true...



Prediction for console Lifetime sales:

Wii:100-120 million, PS3:80-110 million, 360:70-100 million

[Prediction Made 11/5/2009]

3DS: 65m, PSV: 22m, Wii U: 18-22m, PS4: 80-120m, X1: 35-55m

I gauruntee the PS5 comes out after only 5-6 years after the launch of the PS4.

[Prediction Made 6/18/2014]

Eddie_Raja said:

It has to be more than just drivers though.  Drivers don't account for making up a 30% lead in performance!  Here's how I see it:

Nvidia: Puts all effort into building a card that performs well in TODAY's games and perfect Day 1 drivers.  That means they will sacrifice some resources on things that will help a ton in the future if it means better things on release.

AMD: Puts effort into building the strongest card possible while taking into account what games will use in the future.  For example the HD 5000 series had DX11 way before Nvidia did even though it wasn't used a lot until a year after the 5870's release, and the 7970 had 3GB of VRAM when most games didn't use it.  However look at the effects now the 7970 has almost caught up to the Titan.

 

I could see benifits to either system, but honestly it would be better if both were true.  Howver it does seem like day 1 drivers from AMD match Nvidia's these days so maybe both have come true...


I have a simple viewpoint.

AMD cards almost always have newer/better technology on release.  Just takes a while for games and drivers to be optimized for them.



Eddie_Raja said:
Ruler said:
Eddie_Raja said:
Ruler said:
i still preffer Nvidia for pc gaming, a lot of games like older games have no vsync. Nvidia allows you to remove tearing in every game. Just one of many examples.


You can manually apply V-sync in old games with AMD as well.  They also had the supersampling thing forever ago.


Yes did they fixed it ? in nvidia you can select every game you want set how it should run, can you do that with amd now or how does it work?


Of course you can.  Every game comes with an auto-setting option and AMD also has Rapr for the Nvidia Experience stuff.  There was nothing to fix though, you could always do it.

Not true, i had amd card in 2010 and you couldnt turn on a forced vsync 



AMD fan here, I had 2 Nvidia cards in my gaming life, both fried shortly after warranty ended (didn't even overclocked them)... that never happened with AMD cards, which I overclock a little as time goes by to keep up with the games, I have a 3y-old 7950 3GB & it works as a charm, running almost all of my games in full Extra settings or really close to it (damn you Crysis 3!!!). AMD cards are future-proof & really reliable!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001

Around the Network
Ruler said:
Eddie_Raja said:
Ruler said:
Eddie_Raja said:
Ruler said:
i still preffer Nvidia for pc gaming, a lot of games like older games have no vsync. Nvidia allows you to remove tearing in every game. Just one of many examples.


You can manually apply V-sync in old games with AMD as well.  They also had the supersampling thing forever ago.


Yes did they fixed it ? in nvidia you can select every game you want set how it should run, can you do that with amd now or how does it work?


Of course you can.  Every game comes with an auto-setting option and AMD also has Rapr for the Nvidia Experience stuff.  There was nothing to fix though, you could always do it.

Not true, i had amd card in 2010 and you couldnt turn on a forced vsync 

LOL I can't say whether either of them did back then.  I have only had my 7970 for 4 years.  It would be silly to assume they wouldn't update that over 5 years.



Prediction for console Lifetime sales:

Wii:100-120 million, PS3:80-110 million, 360:70-100 million

[Prediction Made 11/5/2009]

3DS: 65m, PSV: 22m, Wii U: 18-22m, PS4: 80-120m, X1: 35-55m

I gauruntee the PS5 comes out after only 5-6 years after the launch of the PS4.

[Prediction Made 6/18/2014]

fatslob-:O said:
Consoles are definitely helping AMD out on the performance front ...


Probably, but the OP has been happening before then.



Prediction for console Lifetime sales:

Wii:100-120 million, PS3:80-110 million, 360:70-100 million

[Prediction Made 11/5/2009]

3DS: 65m, PSV: 22m, Wii U: 18-22m, PS4: 80-120m, X1: 35-55m

I gauruntee the PS5 comes out after only 5-6 years after the launch of the PS4.

[Prediction Made 6/18/2014]