GTA V is a very small game though compared to XBX.

Lol @ people calling this subpar. Show me one game on PS3 with a similar scope, good luck!

I've got GTAV on PS3 and tbh it's nowhere near what I've seen from XCX, the world in XCX not only looks bigger but is more detailed and active in it's ecosystem, GTAV also doesn't have hordes of giant creatures freely roaming about.

Doubt it, and it makes absolutely no difference to me.

The characters can look subpar even if there's nothing similar to compare them to. Your lot say it's a design choice. Great! That doesn't mean everyone has to agree that the design choice looks good. -__-

If you are talking about envrionment variety then it's true, GTA5 is smaller and more dull compared to X but with better looking main character models, I'd say the trade off is worth it since the world of X looks really nice.

I never said anything about characters. Who the fuck cares? You're going to stare at their butts 99% of the time. I'm talking about the scope and environments of the game.

Characters look like a Wii game yes, but that's a small part of the game.

Where did I ever defend the ugly characters of this game?

You never said anything about that directly. But the fucking comparison with GTA5, to which you fucking replied, was made to compare the fucking characters.

I don't know if this trade off comparison is accurate as the enemy designs and vehicle designs in X are as good as the environments, the characters are really the only let down from what I've seen but it seems to not affect all of them at that.

This still beats out GTAV easily.

Those anime based faces look the same everywhere but the bodies are far above ps360 level. for example, the little details on the clothes use polygons while ps360 games use textures (and low res ones).