He doesn't need to. If he's the author of the list, it is implied. Same reason we don't have to constantly write "IMO" when stating an opinion.

If it was a publication list without a face (for example, just "Edge", "Eurogamer", etc) then yes they'd have to be a bit more specific (is it their view of the whole gaming community opinion? was it staff votes? just one person in charge of making it? what was it exactly?) what kind of list it is. But not when it's made by one person.

edit: What I'm trying to say is that a person speaking for himself is (should?) be the norm, while speaking for others is the exception. therefore, only when doing the latter does one need to specify.

i haven't play Sunset Overdrive so i cannot judge, but transistor ??? well i don't agree with the reviewer.

Seriously?

I looked at the list and while I could understand some as soon as they mentioned Alien Issolation, which many expected to be bad and was suprisingly really good, you know they are speaking out of their arse. Transistor is on the list.

Take this list from the hit finding website as bullcrap and nothing more.

It lives.

Best selling new IP ever... it is selling yet a lot... the community is growing like a rocket.

The game is so addictive and fun... it can be love or hate... but there are millions that love the game.

Even the critics are starting to give Destiny the praise it deservers... don't be fooled with the low meta.

BTW. Destiny is in the most GOTY lists... so how it can be disappointing lol

That's a good joke

My exact same reaction

I lold at calling sacred citadel sacred 3

Edit : OMG it is Sacred 3. Ok two things, first im retarded, second wth did they do to sacred

Sunset Overide is actually a pretty good game. Can't believe it's number 1 and Destiny is nowhere on the list.

why is transistor there?