By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Will the PlayStation 4 ever get a proper Halo-like game?

LudicrousSpeed said:
lol @ people in the thread saying Playstation gamers don't need a high quality sci-fi shooter.

Anyway Sony tried with Killzone but didn't get the results. I doubt they'd try again, the shooter crowd is a lot more flooded now than it was when they started the KZ franchise.


I think they are saying they don't need a Halo-like game....which is true. There are already high quality sci-fi shooters so they have those....like you said the shooter market is way more crowded now. Destiny despite it's flas is indeed a pretty high quality sci-fi shooter...along with Bioshock adn Deadspace to give a few examples. KZ is good enough seeing as I am a huge KZ fan that is lol. Loved 2 and SF but 3...not so much it was pretty bad lol.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

Around the Network
Samus Aran said:
Eddie_Raja said:

Well you called Tomb Raider Uncharted.  That game isn't even half as good.

Critics seem to disagree. Of course if Tomb Raider was made by Naughty Dog you would probably be saying something else. 

yeah they seem to disagree with you...

Uncharted: 88

Uncharted 2: 96

Uncharted 3: 92

Tomb Raider: 87

 

all from metacritic...

given by all the previous games and the ammount of GOTYs that ND has won if they made TR it would probably be a better game...



Samus Aran said:
-Ack!- said:
Does the next Mass Effect count? Insomniac could probably make Disruptor 2 or new Resistance, perhaps Ratchet & Clank remake for PS4 could do the trick? I mean it all depends on what you mean by "Halo-like". If you mean COD:AW with aliens and space and stuff, then perhaps we won't see anything quite "Halo-like" in years. =D

Calling Ratchet & Clank a proper Halo-like game is stretching it a bit, don't you think? :p 


Why? It has futuristic guns and weird aliens. :D



Halo sucks. Killzone 10 to 1 over Halo.

User warned for this post -RavenXtra



estebxx said:
Samus Aran said:
Eddie_Raja said:

Well you called Tomb Raider Uncharted.  That game isn't even half as good.

Critics seem to disagree. Of course if Tomb Raider was made by Naughty Dog you would probably be saying something else. 

yeah they seem to disagree with you...

Uncharted: 88

Uncharted 2: 96

Uncharted 3: 92

Tomb Raider: 87

 

all from metacritic...

given by all the previous games and the ammount of GOTYs that ND has won if they made TR it would probably be a better game...

So 87% is now the half of 92%?

Lol. Are you really gloating over something as minor as a 5% difference? 

Are we really going to use metacritic as an example? You do realize that not every review on metacritic is treated the same? Some review sites count more than others, which is stupid. Do the math yourself, add every individual review and divide it by the number of reviews. Your outcome will never match the number metacritic gives. 

Also you're missing two Uncharted games. ;) 

See, this is why so many people voted for Naught Dog as most overrated developer in the thread about most overrated developers. Not because they make bad games, but because their fans treat everything ND makes as a masterpiece that shouldn't be criticized. And some of them disregard similar good games just because they're not made by ND. That's just sad. 



Around the Network
Samus Aran said:
estebxx said:
Samus Aran said:
Eddie_Raja said:

Well you called Tomb Raider Uncharted.  That game isn't even half as good.

Critics seem to disagree. Of course if Tomb Raider was made by Naughty Dog you would probably be saying something else. 

yeah they seem to disagree with you...

Uncharted: 88

Uncharted 2: 96

Uncharted 3: 92

Tomb Raider: 87

 

all from metacritic...

given by all the previous games and the ammount of GOTYs that ND has won if they made TR it would probably be a better game...

So 87% is now the half of 92%?

Lol. Are you really gloating over something as minor as a 5% difference? 

Are we really going to use metacritic as an example? You do realize that not every review on metacritic is treated the same? Some review sites count more than others, which is stupid. Do the math yourself, add every individual review and divide it by the number of reviews. Your outcome will never match the number metacritic gives. 

i took it more in the sense that TR was better than Uncharted, i dont think that Eddie was serious saying that the game is half as good... that would mean that the game is wort a 4.6 or 4.5 Metacritic rating... but if he did well hes obviously wrong.



I feel like if some PS players want to have a Halo-like game, they should just buy an XBO. It's better to get the real thing than hope for something to emulate it effectively.



estebxx said:
Samus Aran said:
estebxx said:
Samus Aran said:
Eddie_Raja said:

Well you called Tomb Raider Uncharted.  That game isn't even half as good.

Critics seem to disagree. Of course if Tomb Raider was made by Naughty Dog you would probably be saying something else. 

yeah they seem to disagree with you...

Uncharted: 88

Uncharted 2: 96

Uncharted 3: 92

Tomb Raider: 87

 

all from metacritic...

given by all the previous games and the ammount of GOTYs that ND has won if they made TR it would probably be a better game...

So 87% is now the half of 92%?

Lol. Are you really gloating over something as minor as a 5% difference? 

Are we really going to use metacritic as an example? You do realize that not every review on metacritic is treated the same? Some review sites count more than others, which is stupid. Do the math yourself, add every individual review and divide it by the number of reviews. Your outcome will never match the number metacritic gives. 

i took it more in the sense that TR was better than Uncharted, i dont think that Eddie was serious saying that the game is half as good... that would mean that the game is wort a 4.6 or 4.5 Metacritic rating... but if he did well hes obviously wrong.

Some people will like Uncharted more, some will like Tomb Raider more. Fact is, if someone likes Uncharted, he'll most likely also like Tomb Raider and vice versa. Hence XBOX owners already have a game like Uncharted. I never said one was better than the other, because that's an opinion and everyone has one (and they are often different!). 

And I wouldn't have bothered responding to him if he said Uncharted was only a little better. I responded because he said Tomb Raider is not even "half as good". I disagree. 



Samus Aran said:

Some people will like Uncharted more, some will like Tomb Raider more. Fact is, if someone likes Uncharted, he'll most likely also like Tomb Raider and vice versa. Hence XBOX owners already have a game like Uncharted. I never said one was better than the other, because that's an opinion and everyone has one (and they are often different!). 

And I wouldn't have bothered responding to him if he said Uncharted was only a little better. I responded because he said Tomb Raider is not even "half as good". I disagree. 

and as i said i dont think he said it literally, but if he did then yes hes wrong.

also isnt TR timed exclusive? or did that changed?



Samus Aran said:
Aeolus451 said:
I don't see the point of even trying to make a halo-like game. I believe that halo and it's clones are on the decline. More realistic FPS's are lasting much longer and bringing more money.

You say this in the year that COD: AW and Destiny released? Lol!



What's so funny? Is halo selling as well?