Deary me, the close to 2million people who bought the MMC in the past 2 months would disagree with you... in fact myself as someone who hasn't moved onto the X1 but have played through from Reach > 4 would definately have to presume you didn't do the same when you call it a "meh story" Even Halo4 who's gameplay was slightly limited by the 360s aging hardware (not a fan of locking doors behind you each room) had one of the best sci fi finales that I've encountered in gaming or movies.

[Also the word is Too! I know you're German but to and too are two seperate words with different meanings :) if you go to the shops it has 1 o in it, if something has Too much explosives it has oo.]

Yeah they do. But the Halo MP beta is different in that it's actually a beta and a long time before release. Nowadays the betas are like a month before the game launches.

That's nice, but what does your personal experience have to do with theirs? Are you a clown for not agreeing with them? Or does this only go one way? ^^

It would be I'd be pretty happy if they did though. The technique respires a lot of refining, and could do without GG smothering it with motion blur (they seem to really like that in their MP...), but the technique itself was pretty interesting. I'd love to see more developers have a go at it.

Fixed

It's a beta, ok... there's 11 months for the launch, ok... But;
- 720p as resolution even for beta is patetic. To me, this proves that this game, will not have more than 900p.
- having dips, framerate and effects issues in this stage, not good sign. Can be fixed ok, but....
- But to me the most concerning aspect is, even that is a beta, having TEARING in a 720p game is ridiculous.
Xbox fans talked a lot of shit about Uncharted 4, but now, what you all have to talk. Your best game and proud hope is not having good beggining, right...

They can do 1080p with 60 fps, but it will sacrifice some graphic, if they want to do more they need time to release on 2016, even if they put 1000 worker that's still to hard to create house engine that can run code to close to metal like what Naughty dog does, and for what i can see they need to focus first with multiplayer first and second with graphic, i think we will see some graphic improvement with Halo 6, or game that will be release on 2016-2017 onward. But it's still to hard to judge for now, but still my concern is not with the hardware but with human resource and from what recent multiplayer fiasco with MCC. It will be great if they can deliver promising multiplayer aspect with some graphic improvement, but MCC told us differently so we will wait and see.

I have no agenda Mr. "Xbox Empire" lol, though I am sorry if my statement hurts yours.  Maybe I shouldn't have said 30 FPS, but it is jery as hell, and I stand by my statement that I would worry if they can improve it that much. 

Moderated - Leadified

Errrr 11 months is more time than goes into each yearly battlefield game or Fifa from the very start, do you really think they come out exactly the way they run and look before production begins?

Damn Battlefield 4 launched in a Beta state and took another few months to get to a point where it was almost considered ready to release, being 11 months from launch and having a next gen engine that mostly works is a great place to be for 343 for a smooth unbroken launch of Halo 5.

thats not racist kid. nice try though. it's obvious you dont care for the halo franchise. that's cool and all but dont waste your time hating on it.