I would not go that far. I think it was very good for its time just does not hold up. I wish they would attempt the 2D Sidescroller style again though.

DS IMHO all those games were mediocore. At least the original still holds up

Non, all Zelda games are awesome....well apart from those CDi shite.

I suppose to be fair I didn't live through the NES era, as I was born in January 1989, and started gaming on the SNES, but I've still played quite a bit of NES, and while there were plenty of games I could get into and enjoy, like the original Mario trilogy, Contra, and Gradius, even compared to the standards of other NES games I found Zelda II nigh unplayable.

From what I've heard/seen, the DS.

By today's standards the NES is the weakest. But I don't think that's fair so I didn't vote for it. I was tempted to vote for the GameCube because of Wind Waker but Twilight Princess redeems it. I wanted to vote for GBA because of 4 Swords, but Minish Cap is a decent game. So I went with GBC and the Oracle games primarily because of their gimmick of being linked together.

GBA, not counting the remakes, Four Swords and Minish Cap were meh.

Haven't touched the 3DS ones.

NES, distantly followed by DS. NES Zelda games aged extremely poorly, while the DS games were just average in terms of Zelda games (or at least Spirit Tracks was; I liked Phantom Hourglass better for some reason).

This thread is moot since there aren't really any bad Zelda games. They're all good except one is the greatest.

 So in the spirit of the thread I'm going to say everything but SNES.

Alright who is the lil shit who voted n64