By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Has Zelda U set the new standard for grass in a video game?

 

so has it?

of course, dat grass is amazing 154 49.52%
 
maybe 41 13.18%
 
No! 92 29.58%
 
See Results 24 7.72%
 
Total:311
SocialistSlayer said:
there is nothing graphically demanding coming from zelda (or any nintendo ip for that matter). zelda is a really graphically simple game, the grass is correspondingly simple.
but for people who like zelda and nintendo games, im sure it will be good for their tastes

any particular reason for your downplaying?



Around the Network
SocialistSlayer said:
there is nothing graphically demanding coming from zelda (or any nintendo ip for that matter). zelda is a really graphically simple game, the grass is correspondingly simple.
but for people who like zelda and nintendo games, im sure it will be good for their tastes


Drawing a Picasso is also not graphically demanding. But still you would fell lucky if you could afford one. 

Nintendo games ARE ART in gameplay and style. 

And we can feel lucky that this kind of art is affordable. Yet many don't get it.

Buying by looking soley on technical specifications just means lack of knowledge and confidence doing the right thing...



Ka-pi96 said:
I think the grass in Uncharted looked way better.

I don't recall seeing any grass in uncharted.



Nothing new or CPU intensive there.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Materia-Blade said:
SocialistSlayer said:
there is nothing graphically demanding coming from zelda (or any nintendo ip for that matter). zelda is a really graphically simple game, the grass is correspondingly simple.
but for people who like zelda and nintendo games, im sure it will be good for their tastes

any particular reason for your downplaying?

im not. im sure nintedno fans likes yourself will enjoy this game, and enjoy its graphics. i wont



 

Around the Network

Not sure if this is a joke thread...or OP has been enjoying certain types of grass prior to making the thread.



Too much grass.



SocialistSlayer said:
Materia-Blade said:
SocialistSlayer said:
there is nothing graphically demanding coming from zelda (or any nintendo ip for that matter). zelda is a really graphically simple game, the grass is correspondingly simple.
but for people who like zelda and nintendo games, im sure it will be good for their tastes

any particular reason for your downplaying?

im not. im sure nintedno fans likes yourself will enjoy this game, and enjoy its graphics. i wont

I'll rephrase it. zelda for wii u is very graphically demanding, yet you are downplaying it. why?



Materia-Blade said:
SocialistSlayer said:
Materia-Blade said:
SocialistSlayer said:
there is nothing graphically demanding coming from zelda (or any nintendo ip for that matter). zelda is a really graphically simple game, the grass is correspondingly simple.
but for people who like zelda and nintendo games, im sure it will be good for their tastes

any particular reason for your downplaying?

im not. im sure nintedno fans likes yourself will enjoy this game, and enjoy its graphics. i wont

I'll rephrase it. zelda for wii u is very graphically demanding, yet you are downplaying it. why?


its not, its a very simple graphical game, simple textures, simple non complex lighting solutions, simple animations, simple character designs, simple environmental detail. Nothing is complex in it.



 

I really like how this game looks, and it will age better than Uncharted since its cel shaded, and yeah the grass looks great, but im not sure if its the best looking one out there.