prayformojo said:
They should include it with every PS+ sub. |
If they want to make a huge loss on the service, sure.
What I really wonder is how expensive the subscription service will be, it will probably be something insane.
prayformojo said:
They should include it with every PS+ sub. |
If they want to make a huge loss on the service, sure.
What I really wonder is how expensive the subscription service will be, it will probably be something insane.
IamAwsome said:
They won't do that because then everyone will have access to it. They would want it to be an extra charge. |
Right but when you think about it, they're basically saying you'll need TWO subs for one gaming console lol. I mean, just saying that sounds ridiculous to me. I know it's suppose to be thought of as an extra etc, but come on. Two subs? Seems like overkill.
If they gave this away with PS+ and stopped giving away free games, that would/might offset the difference or at least mitigate it. It would be a death blow for MS imo because they don't HAVE a service like this.
prayformojo said:
|
lol, entitled much?

prayformojo said:
Right but when you think about it, they're basically saying you'll need TWO subs for one gaming console lol. I mean, just saying that sounds ridiculous to me. I know it's suppose to be thought of as an extra etc, but come on. Two subs? Seems like overkill. If they gave this away with PS+ and stopped giving away free games, that would/might offset the difference or at least mitigate it. It would be a death blow for MS imo because they don't HAVE a service like this. |
They cant do this because of the PS3. It would esentually kill it instantly.
FIT_Gamer said:
|
No, I just think expecting anyone to pay two subscriptions for one console is a bit overkill unless you're rich or live with mom and dad and don't have bills to pay. I also think that allowing some sort of basic free entry to PSnow would be a good advantage against the 'Bone.
2008ProchargedGT said:
|
Maybe, but it IS an 8 year old console. Steve Jobs once said when asked about the iPhone cannibalizing iPod sales "It's a good problem to have." If people start buying PS4's to get PSnow and stop buying PS3's, that's not a bad problem to have.
prayformojo said:
|
My point was you can get PSnow on ps3 so game sales would plummet
prayformojo said:
Right but when you think about it, they're basically saying you'll need TWO subs for one gaming console lol. I mean, just saying that sounds ridiculous to me. I know it's suppose to be thought of as an extra etc, but come on. Two subs? Seems like overkill. If they gave this away with PS+ and stopped giving away free games, that would/might offset the difference or at least mitigate it. It would be a death blow for MS imo because they don't HAVE a service like this. |
But it is a seperate service from PS+ just like Music Unlimited is seperate from PS+. They don't overlap at all. Technically, PS4 has had two subscriptions since launch. Throw Netflix, Crackle, Hulu+ on there and its like 5 subscriptions.
Hell you don't even need PS+ for PSNow so if you want to emulate older games rather than play online, then just get that.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank


| 2008ProchargedGT said: My point was you can get PSnow on ps3 so game sales would plummet |
My bad, sorry. But an easy fix for that would obviously be to just make it a PS4 exclusive. I mean what's the point of even having this on PS3 when all the old games are there to buy and the hardware can play any PS3 disc you buy off ebay?