NOOOOO!

This game was review proof from the get go, and just like every other Nintendo game this gen it'll been praised out the arse and have a mixed reception from those that actually play it, because while technically spot-on, it's the same game we've all been playing for the last 15 years.

Nintendo makes some of the highest quality games on the market, they just need to stop recycling so damn much.

He seems to have a lot of issues stemming from the past with family and the N64 origianl o.O

But in all fairness, I'm glad that 80 is considered terrible for this game, the bulk of the reviews seem to be showing that it is the type of game we had all hoped. Let's hope the online for Wii U is solid!

Lol, no SSE so lower score, lets ignore everything else! Thank you^ :)

Darn, oh well! Btw, people should read that low review... its pretty wtf worthy

its the same for every  console.... call of duty 1,2,3,4,5,,6,7  and so on.....

far cry 1.2.3.4.5.6. and so on.....

halo 1.2.3.4.5.6.7 and so on...

gta 1.2.3.4.5.6 and so on........

nhl 2014.15.16.17.18.19 ......

and we can add 100 more franchise with the same fucking game years after years...

thats sounds recycling to me..... 

people are dumb, cause they still buying those  kind fo  game???

Its a shame that some reviewers will hold that against this game. I enjoyed Subspace Emissary, but this game has refined the formula quite a bit and has plenty of new modes to make up for the lack of that single one :/

Same gameplay, totally different settings. Nintendo has been making completely interchangable games for a couple generations now is all I'm getting at. The same can be applied to Halo. Far Cry 1,2 and 3 were each substantially different.

The ignorance is strong with this one.

Indeed. (I'm just going to agree here, I'm pretty ignorant in being able to tell the differences and similarities between games).