By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Assassin’s Creed Unity leaker provides clarity on its graphical fidelity

Sentient_Nebula on 01 November 2014
foodfather said:
WagnerPaiva said:

I wil buy it when it cost 10 dollars, like all Assassins Creed games end up costing...

Gimme 1080p and I will buy it sooner.

You surely can't believe what you are saying???

A few extra barely noticable pixels is the difference between buying a game day 1 and buying a game 1 year later???

I have no doubt that the ''leaks'' are doctored or from a past build. They looked abysmal yet footage I've seen recently the game looks perfectly fine. 

i think it's more to do with boycotting Ubisoft's practices, rather than a significantly worse product.



"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."

-Samuel Clemens

Around the Network
Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 01 November 2014
shikamaru317 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

DA:I can fucking run on a fucking 8800 GT! And you are telling me that Asscreed requires a fucking 680 as a minimum? That is just so retarded

To be fair, DA: I is cross-gen, AC Unity isn't. So it makes sense that DA:I's minimum requirements would be that low, it had to be able to run on 360/PS3. A 680 is very high for a minimum, but chances are it's a super inflated minimum, you'll see that with games sometimes, we've had a few cases of inflated minimums so far this year. Chances are the actual minimum is more like a GTX 460 if you're ok with 720p, 30 fps at low settings.

See, a 460 gtx makes sense as a minimum but its like, those (the 680) minimum's are directly from ubisoft and its like, what the hell is the point? I really dont understand the value of "inflating" the requirements cause one would think that it would turn more people off cause of the high requirements. Plus its Ubisoft and Watch_Dogs on max had quite a few dips on Titans (See TB's review) without looking like a game that should require that kind of horsepower even on max so I do expect poor optomizations from Ubisoft on asscreed even if it is inflacted.

And I understand that DA:I is cross gen but other cross gen games dont even have that as a minimum so it is still nice to see that old gpus are still able to play some games.

Edit: And heck, Starcitizen, a game that is touted to be worthy of the "Master Race Award" for putting every other game's technical graphics to shame has a much lower requirements than asscreed

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz/ AMD Phenom X2
CPU Speed: Info
RAM: 8 GB
OS: Windows 7 or Windows 8
Video Card: NVidia Geforce 460GTX AMD Radeon HD5850 DirectX 11
Sound Card: Yes


                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Ninsect on 02 November 2014
foodfather said:
WagnerPaiva said:

I wil buy it when it cost 10 dollars, like all Assassins Creed games end up costing...

Gimme 1080p and I will buy it sooner.


You surely can't believe what you are saying???

A few extra barely noticable pixels is the difference between buying a game day 1 and buying a game 1 year later???

I have no doubt that the ''leaks'' are doctored or from a past build. They looked abysmal yet footage I've seen recently the game looks perfectly fine. 

 

It's not just a "few" pixels... 900p to 1080p is a massive jump



The One and Only

VizionEck.com

curl-6 on 02 November 2014

WagnerPaiva said:

Gimme 1080p and I will buy it sooner.

I'm pretty confident the PS4 version will be patched to 1080p, just like Black Flag.



daredevil.shark on 02 November 2014
Ninsect said:

It's not just a "few" pixels... 900p to 1080p is a massive jump


Played watch dogs at 900p in PS4. It didnt hampered my gaming experience much. And people are forgetting PS3 always had lower resolution compared to Xbox 360. In the end gaming experience matters. Not resolution.



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 02 November 2014

It looks like garbage guys. Time to accept it and move on.



NobleTeam360 on 02 November 2014

Was going to get AC at launch but now I'm willing to wait (nothing to do with the graphics btw) I just know this game will be 20 bucks in like 5 or 6 months so I'm not throwing down 60 bucks for a game I'll only play a couple of times through, sorry Ubi, I've learned my lesson with Watch Dogs



Experimental42 on 02 November 2014
shikamaru317 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

DA:I can fucking run on a fucking 8800 GT! And you are telling me that Asscreed requires a fucking 680 as a minimum? That is just so retarded

To be fair, DA: I is cross-gen, AC Unity isn't. So it makes sense that DA:I's minimum requirements would be that low, it had to be able to run on 360/PS3. A 680 is very high for a minimum, but chances are it's a super inflated minimum, you'll see that with games sometimes, we've had a few cases of inflated minimums so far this year. Chances are the actual minimum is more like a GTX 460 if you're ok with 720p, 30 fps at low settings.

Even if you tapped the PS4 and XB1 to their limits it still shouldn't require  a 680  minimum or recommended to run a PC game at equivalency if you didn't port your game with the same level of care a monkey shows when flinging its sh*t.