shikamaru317 said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
DA:I can fucking run on a fucking 8800 GT! And you are telling me that Asscreed requires a fucking 680 as a minimum? That is just so retarded
|
To be fair, DA: I is cross-gen, AC Unity isn't. So it makes sense that DA:I's minimum requirements would be that low, it had to be able to run on 360/PS3. A 680 is very high for a minimum, but chances are it's a super inflated minimum, you'll see that with games sometimes, we've had a few cases of inflated minimums so far this year. Chances are the actual minimum is more like a GTX 460 if you're ok with 720p, 30 fps at low settings.
|
See, a 460 gtx makes sense as a minimum but its like, those (the 680) minimum's are directly from ubisoft and its like, what the hell is the point? I really dont understand the value of "inflating" the requirements cause one would think that it would turn more people off cause of the high requirements. Plus its Ubisoft and Watch_Dogs on max had quite a few dips on Titans (See TB's review) without looking like a game that should require that kind of horsepower even on max so I do expect poor optomizations from Ubisoft on asscreed even if it is inflacted.
And I understand that DA:I is cross gen but other cross gen games dont even have that as a minimum so it is still nice to see that old gpus are still able to play some games.
Edit: And heck, Starcitizen, a game that is touted to be worthy of the "Master Race Award" for putting every other game's technical graphics to shame has a much lower requirements than asscreed
| CPU: |
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz/ AMD Phenom X2 |
| OS: |
Windows 7 or Windows 8 |
| Video Card: |
NVidia Geforce 460GTX AMD Radeon HD5850 DirectX 11 |
