By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Vita autopsy: What Went Wrong?

 

What was the biggest reason for the Vita's failure?

Not enough advertising 37 11.04%
 
Not enough games 89 26.57%
 
Too expensive (Including memory cards) 96 28.66%
 
The 3DS was just too mighty 73 21.79%
 
Other 40 11.94%
 
Total:335

High cost + outrageous memory card prices.

Pointless 3g

3ds's already huge install base and library.



Around the Network
Zackasaurus-rex said:


Untrue. The system literally LAUNCHED with a fantastic Uncharted title and continued to receive major AAA initiatives from old IPs (Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, Assassin's Creed, Persona, CoD (albeit not a very good game), etc.) and new IPs (Tearaway, Gravity Rush, Freedom Wars, Soul Sacrifice) in addition to unprecedented indie support, robust integration with the PS3 and even more so with the PS4. Simultaneously, it has unprecedented indie support and intense support from the niche Japanese games sector.

Games are not and never were the Vita's struggle. In fact, Vita owners continue to buy more games per system than what is done on any other system.

The Vita's library has become more niche over time, but this is in response to the sales, not the cause of the sales.

Really ? ... 

The launch was fantastic but the support overall is terrible. A launch doesn't define a platform's library. 

"Vita owners continue to buy more games per system than what is done on any other system" 

Oh please, don't make me laugh when it has one of the WORST tie ratio's ever a system could have ... 



Extra Credits put it best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REaUzHef9h4



"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.

Colin Moriarty jinxed it with his infamous article



my opinion on why the Vita failed is basically the same as Extra Credits

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REaUzHef9h4

but also has been said in this thread already the expensive memory cards and lack of marketing and the declining sales of Handhelds in general also played a big role into its failure



Around the Network
fatslob-:O said:
Zackasaurus-rex said:


Untrue. The system literally LAUNCHED with a fantastic Uncharted title and continued to receive major AAA initiatives from old IPs (Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, Assassin's Creed, Persona, CoD (albeit not a very good game), etc.) and new IPs (Tearaway, Gravity Rush, Freedom Wars, Soul Sacrifice) in addition to unprecedented indie support, robust integration with the PS3 and even more so with the PS4. Simultaneously, it has unprecedented indie support and intense support from the niche Japanese games sector.

Games are not and never were the Vita's struggle. In fact, Vita owners continue to buy more games per system than what is done on any other system.

The Vita's library has become more niche over time, but this is in response to the sales, not the cause of the sales.

Really ? ... 

The launch was fantastic but the support overall is terrible. A launch doesn't define a platform's library. 

"Vita owners continue to buy more games per system than what is done on any other system" 

Oh please, don't make me laugh when it has one of the WORST tie ratio's ever a system could have ... 


Regarding the last statement, this just tells us that you are uninformed on the subject. While VGC's consistently troubled tracking of physical sales tells one imperfect story, it completely neglects the digital side, and digital sales make up a higher percentage of Vita sales than they do on any other console/handheld. Devs have spoken out about the high attach ratio, indicating that it was over ten games per system owners many months back. That's actually pretty incredible. It makes sense, though. The Vita has an extremely core demographic, meaning that people who don't consume a lot of games aren't likely to buy a Vita. Meanwhile, the Vitas has more than a strong enough library to keep that core buying.

Regarding the first thing, you're making a fallacy. A launch doesn't define a platform's library (though the titles I mentioned go way, way beyond launch), but it does indicate early success. What we learnt from the Vita is that excellent games from new IPs and popular old IPs alike were not driving sales. The games were not the problem (though certainly we can endlessly posit that more games at least constantly help to some degree), because the system was not selling particularly well even when it was releasing quality, high-profile games much more than the 3DS was. Blaming a fancied lack of games is to not understand that the system and its positioning are the real problems. The Vita gets less high-profile exclusives now than it used to get because the system itself did not sell well enough when it already had the games. This is a bit of a chicken-and-egg scenario, and you're getting it wrong.



VGC double-posted for soem reason. I'd delete this if I could. lol



They buried the handheld while it was still alive. That is what went wrong.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

LOL, dude said autopsy xD



Mystro-Sama said:
LOL, dude said autopsy xD

It's a fitting word. It's dead, and we want to know what killed it.



"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."

-Samuel Clemens