By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - What is your stance on hardcore pornography?

Porn is for jokers that can't get any, and have to watch naked people doing stuff that they just can't get on their own - weather because their jerks, stupid, or whatever.

The best kind of hardcore pornography? Screwing your wife. If you want porn, take some of you & the lady your married to. Simple enough.

:)



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

Around the Network
OooSnap said:
Um, that's not a study. That's an opinion article.

 

An article that's based off of a study. Or do you think they made up the 10% increase = a 7.3% decrease number.

Based off of the studies you quoted it seemed a full out report would be pointless since it seems like you don't have any statistical training and really wouldn't understand it.

I mean the first thing you learn is the difference between correlation and causation and how to spot out confounding variables.

 



mrstickball said:
Porn is for jokers that can't get any, and have to watch naked people doing stuff that they just can't get on their own - weather because their jerks, stupid, or whatever.

The best kind of hardcore pornography? Screwing your wife. If you want porn, take some of you & the lady your married to. Simple enough.

:)

True enough.  The last thing you need to do is take away the last recourse of a desperate man.  Well I guess there is always the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue.  Which is somethign I actually do have a problem with.

 



69



mrstickball said:
Porn is for jokers that can't get any, and have to watch naked people doing stuff that they just can't get on their own - weather because their jerks, stupid, or whatever.

The best kind of hardcore pornography? Screwing your wife. If you want porn, take some of you & the lady your married to. Simple enough.

:)

For those of us who don't have wives or a live-in SO, porn is much more convenient, satisfies urges when your SO isn't around, and there's no risk of STDs. :P



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

Around the Network

I always assume the power stance.



Garcian Smith said:
iclim4 said:

Oh okay I gotcha.... I thought it was the more extreme bonding and whipping stuff *cringe*


 I rather like movies where bonding occurs between characters. I don't know about extreme bonding, though. :)

@ kenzomatic - Anecdotes are not a substitute for data.


Sure, tease the guy that doesnt know how to speak english.
Not everyone grew up in the States okay?........ Asshat

j/k okay I fixed it




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                         iclim4 - "The Friends Thread changed my life!" (Pervert Alert!)                                            Tags? 

Porn degrades women? Just take a look at how men are depicted! Emotionless fuckmachines built like brick houses, who always feel like it, and never need any *ahem* attention paid to themselves. I shudder at the thought of a day when women start expecting real men to be like that.

Seriously though, I have nothing against the production of porn, as long as it's consenting adults who're involved in it. I find a great deal of the stuff commonly found in most porn (money shots etc) utterly unarousing and disgusting, but I'd like to thing Western civilization has advanced beyond the point of "I don't like it, so it sholud be outlawed!".



Oh look another link

www.nwci.ie/content/download/256/1166/file/National-ob-ireland2.pdf

here's you study unfortunitly its about the effects



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1
kenzomatic said:
Garcian Smith said:
kenzomatic said:
Garcian Smith said:
kenzomatic said:
OooSnap I'm glad your on this site.

If you believe, Athiest or not, that the people making porn don't have serious physiological issues, well the I put you the same boat as people who think the moon landing was faked. Actually worse.

Yeah man, denying that an obvious event happened against all evidence is totally equivalent to not believing an unfounded generalization. Preach on, brotha'.


Fine a significant number of them suffered abuse as children.


Did you survey a sufficient sample size to know this yourself?


Have you ever read any books published by pornstars? They have a common thread, and they tell about the other people as well. Do you know who linda lovelace is? Also talk to some physiatrist.


Which phsyciatrist. Saying that a majority of pornstars were sexually abused when they were younger is a stupid thing to say.

Are sexually abused people more likely to do porn? Why yes they are. They are also more likely to just go around sleeping with people randomly. People who aren't sexually abused do both also, and a greater number do both. A lower percentage but a higher number.

Note, i have a degree in psychology. Also had a class in psychology when dealing with sex. Also it wasn't from Bob Jones Univercity.