Onyxmeth said:
|
Onyxmeth said:
|
shio said:
PC does not have Gears 2, but it has: Crysis Warhead S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky Quake Live Zeno Clash Battlefield Heroes All these from the second half of 2008. Ofcourse there are more PC shooters, but I only thought the ones I mentioned are relevant. It more than makes up for the lack of 1 Consolized Shooter. |
No these 5 games you have listed (BTW: About 2 or 3 of them are mediocre) can't compete with GeoW2.
Just play with your PC and stop making stupid trolling comments in videogame forums. Thank you.
JaggedSac said:
No Spore? It is going to be the biggest PC game of the year. |
I only mentioned exclusive PC shooters that were coming in the later half of 2008, which is fairer to compare to Gear of War 2.
shio said:
|
opinions are not facts. FACT !
Barozi said:
No these 5 games you have listed (BTW: About 2 or 3 of them are mediocre) can't compete with GeoW2. Just play with your PC and stop making stupid trolling comments in videogame forums. Thank you. |
Sorry but Crysis Warhead alone should be better than Gears 2. The singleplayer side will easily be better on Crysis Warhead, and CW's online is not gimped by console limitations.
So far the impressions given on Crysis Warhead were much better than the original Crysis.
shio said:
Sorry but Crysis Warhead alone should be better than Gears 2. The singleplayer side will easily be better on Crysis Warhead, and CW's online is not gimped by console limitations. So far the impressions given on Crysis Warhead were much better than the original Crysis. |
Once more opinion. I could agree with Crysis 2 is better/bigger than GeoW2, but Crysis Warhead is just a better expansion pack. (I know that it's a full game)
And just for your information. I really liked Crysis.
shio said:
|
1. "My bro's 360" is a common argument to justify talking trash about the 360 while not sounding totally ignorant. I'm not saying it's not true in your case, but it's just been used so many times for the wrong reasons. Benefit of the doubt I will grant. No need to discuss further.
2. If all of the 360 games are your bro's then you haven't had the hard mutliplatform decision to make. I don't actually believe you'd choose any 360 version over the PC version, which works in favor of what I'm trying to say. What's the point of owning a 360 if you have a "gaming PC" and vice versa?
3. It does matter if people can't run Crysis. How else do you define the difference between a gaming PC and a non-gaming PC? Where do you put the benchmark of seperation? I say it's supposed to go to the top, so you should be able to play the most technically challenging game. Why should Left 4 Dead be the benchmark if it takes less requirements? In that case I can just draw the line at Planescape Torment since any current day PC can operate it. That's where the problem lies in PCs is how to seperate what is what on a totally open platform. This is why I don't dabble in comparing PCs to consoles. Too many variables.
4. Your "facts" look awfully close to an e-penis measuring opinion but that's just one man's opinion...or is that "fact"?
Lol.Lost odysseys?And left 4 dead and Last renmannt coming to ps3 , dont know if others will come too,and few of those games comes to pc.
Take my love, take my land..
| Simulacrum said: Lol.Lost odysseys?And left 4 dead and Last renmannt coming to ps3 , dont know if others will come too,and few of those games comes to pc. |
Oh god this is like a broken record. Seriously troll i've explained myself multiple times over already on this page alone. Go back to your cave.
Also what is your problem with Lost Odyssey being on the list? Is it not exclusive?