XBox 360 Exclusives of 2008

[Onyxmeth]

shio said:

Onyxmeth said:

shio said:

I own a PC and own a 360 (sort of),Oh, so you "sort of" own a 360. Gotcha. We have a lot of people here that "sort of" own a 360. It usually to justify their stance in an argument by not sounding like an outsider. Let me guess, is it's your friend's 360, brother's 360 or roomate's 360?

My bro's 360. so? It's still available to me most of the time.

and just like many people I am forced to decide about which platform I have to buy the multiplats. That's awfully funny since your gaming collection shows just PC games. What were these decisions you were forced to make again with multiplats or did you just pick PC every time?

I also have a PS2, PS1, Game Gear, Megadrive, NES, Master System, and had a Gameboy, Dreamcast and recently gave my Wii away. I also have alot more PC games than the ones I listed. I'm not sure what's your point.

And even if I remembered to add 360 games to my profile, it would be the ones with the least reason because all the games were bought by my brother.

Infact, I'd bet there are more people who are dual PC/360 owners than 360/PS3 owners, which would totally ruin your idiotic definition of "exclusive". Of course there are more PC/360 owners than 360/PS3 owners. If I could guess I would say 100% of this site owns a PC. What's your point? That doesn't mean everyone's PC can play Crysis. A PC is not a console, in the same way that a handheld, mobile phone and arcade caibnet aren't either. Should the PS3 list remove Tekken 6 because someone could essentially purchase the arcade cabinet, rendering the game multiplatform?

It doesn't matter if most people can't run Crysis. I'm talking about people who have PC's gaming-ready (even if they don't run Crysis) as long as it runs games like Left 4 Dead. I'm betting there are more 360/PC-gaming-ready owners than 360/PS3 owners

By the way, I'm actually making a thread about the turning point and beginning of PC dominance each generation, which is happening in the second half of 2008. And just the PC's lineup of 2008's second half totally crushes your entire Xbox 360 lineup of 2008. Wow. Talk about an e-penis.

No e-penis here, just facts.

 

 

 

 

1. "My bro's 360" is a common argument to justify talking trash about the 360 while not sounding totally ignorant. I'm not saying it's not true in your case, but it's just been used so many times for the wrong reasons. Benefit of the doubt I will grant. No need to discuss further.

2. If all of the 360 games are your bro's then you haven't had the hard mutliplatform decision to make. I don't actually believe you'd choose any 360 version over the PC version, which works in favor of what I'm trying to say. What's the point of owning a 360 if you have a "gaming PC" and vice versa?

3. It does matter if people can't run Crysis. How else do you define the difference between a gaming PC and a non-gaming PC? Where do you put the benchmark of seperation? I say it's supposed to go to the top, so you should be able to play the most technically challenging game. Why should Left 4 Dead be the benchmark if it takes less requirements? In that case I can just draw the line at Planescape Torment since any current day PC can operate it. That's where the problem lies in PCs is how to seperate what is what on a totally open platform. This is why I don't dabble in comparing PCs to consoles. Too many variables.

4. Your "facts" look awfully close to an e-penis measuring opinion but that's just one man's opinion...or is that "fact"?